4
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi
B.A. No.3233 of 2011
Surendra Prasad Singh.................Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Jharkhand .........Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD
For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar
For the State : A.P.P
2/ 20.5.11
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and
learned counsel appearing for the State.
The petitioner is an accused in Baliapur P.S. Case no.54 of
2009 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner, owner of the vehicle, has been made accused as it is said
that the looted articles were being transported to other place but the
petitioner being owner was not knowning at all that the articles which had
been carried in the vehicle was the subject matter of dacoity.
Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of
the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction Judicial Magistrate,
1st class, Dhanbad in Baliapur P.S case no.54 of 2009 (G.R.No.1825 of
2009).
( R. R. Prasad, J.)
ND/