High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Surendra Rai & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 18 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Surendra Rai & Anr. vs The State Of Bihar on 18 August, 2011
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Criminal Miscellaneous No.24373 of 2011
                     1. Surendra Rai, son of Late Harihar Rai
                     2. Ram Nihal Rai, son of Late Gariba Rai.
                     Both residents of village - Diyaman, Police Station -
                     Krishna Brahm, District - Buxar.
                                                                ------ Petitioners.
                                              Versus
                   The State of Bihar                   ------ Opposite Party
                                              ---------

02. 18.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners,

learned counsel for the informant and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The two petitioners, apprehending their

arrest in connection with Buxar Town P.S. Case No.

114/2008, pending in the court of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Buxar, are named accused in this case

instituted on the basis of complaint case no. 395-C of

2008 carry allegation of executing sale deeds by

impersonation. One title suit no. 33 of 2007 has already

been earlier instituted and still pending between the

parties on the same subject matter.

Considering the facts and circumstances of

the case, in the event of their arrest or surrender within

a period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioners

be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of
2

Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties

of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief

Judicial Magistrate, Buxar, in connection with Buxar

Town P.S. Case No. 114/2008, subject to condition

under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court

regularly at least for two years or till disposal of the

case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on

two consecutive dates, without any reasonable

explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to

be cancelled.

Rajeev/                         ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)