High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Suresh Kumar Sharma @ Suresh … vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr. on 9 February, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Suresh Kumar Sharma @ Suresh … vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr. on 9 February, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Cr.Misc. No.5271 of 2011
                  1. Suresh Kumar Sharma @ Suresh Sharma son of late
                     Baleshwar Sharma, resident of village- Uday, P.S.-
                     Jokihat, District-Araria.
                  2. Lalit Kumar Sharma @ Lalit Sharma son of Akhilesh
                     Sharma.
                  3. Chandan Kumar Sharma @ Chandan Sharma son of
                     Akhilesh Sharma.
                  Residents of village and P.S.- Jokihat, District-Araria -
                     Petitioners.
                                           Versus
                  1. The State of Bihar.
                  2. Kanchan Devi D/O Arun Maharaj, resident of village-
                     Bhaluahi, P.S. Udakishunganj, District- Madhepura -
                     Opp. Parties.
                                             -----------

2/ 09-02-2011 Heard the parties.

This is second attempt made by the petitioners

seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint

Case No.632 of 2005. The prayer for anticipatory bail made

on behalf of the petitioners was rejected by speaking order

dated 20.05.2010 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 7699 of 2010

(Annexure-1). While rejecting the prayer for anticipatory

bail, this Court had noticed that the petitioners were

mainly responsible for killing of the husband of the

complainant.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

subsequently some other accused persons have been

granted anticipatory bail. Obviously, the order dated

20.05.2010 (Annexure-1) was not brought to the notice of

that Court, while considering the prayer for anticipatory

bail made on behalf of those co-accused persons and this
2

fact appears to have been deliberately concealed. In that

view of the matter, this Court does not find any valid

ground for reviewing its previous order.

Accordingly, the present petition for grant of

anticipatory bail is rejected once again. The petitioners

must surrender in the court below in connection with

Complaint Case No. 632 of 2005 pending in the court of

learned C.J.M., Madhepura within four weeks and, if so

advised, seek regular bail.

( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)
BTiwary/