High Court Kerala High Court

Suresh Kumar vs State Of Kerala on 22 December, 2010

Kerala High Court
Suresh Kumar vs State Of Kerala on 22 December, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 4858 of 2010()


1. SURESH KUMAR, S/O. NARAYANAN,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. KISHORE, S/O. SHAJI,
3. RAVI, S/O. KUNJAPPAN,

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JAI GEORGE

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :22/12/2010

 O R D E R

M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J.

——————————-
Crl.M.C.Nos.4858 & 4994 of 2010

——————————-

COMMON ORDER

Petitioners, the accused in C.R.Nos.36/2010 and

41/2010 of Excise Range, Thrissur, filed these

petitions under Section 482 of Code of Criminal

Procedure to quash the prosecution contending that

though Division Bench of this Court upheld the maximum

percentage of ethyl alcohol present in toddy as

provided under the Rules, Honourable Supreme Court in

Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)Nos.14353-

14365/2010 stayed the prosecution in respect of those

cases for violation of the Rule prescribing maximum

percentage of ethyl alcohol content in toddy.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

and learned Public Prosecutor were heard.

3. Argument of the learned counsel appearing for

the petitioners is that prosecution has been lodged

based on the Division Bench decision of this Court,

upholding the maximum percentage of ethyl alcohol

content prescribed under the Rules and as Honourable

Supreme court had stayed the prosecution in Petitions

CRMC 4858&4994/10 2

for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil)Nos.14353-

14365/2010, prosecution in this case is either to be

quashed or stayed.

4. As rightly pointed out by the learned Public

Prosecutor, Division Bench decision has not been

overruled or even stayed by the Honourable Supreme

Court and it still holds the field. It is binding on

this Court. Hence, the cases cannot be quashed as

sought for. Honourable Supreme Court stayed only the

prosecution of those accused in those cases and there

is no general stay of prosecution. In such

circumstances, petitioners are not entitled to get an

order to quash the proceedings or to stay the

prosecution.

Petitions are dismissed.

22nd December, 2010 (M.Sasidharan Nambiar, Judge)
tkv