High Court Jharkhand High Court

Suresh Prasad Singh vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 29 July, 2011

Jharkhand High Court
Suresh Prasad Singh vs State Of Jharkhand & Ors on 29 July, 2011
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
                         W.P.(S) No.4054 of 2011
           Suresh Prasad Singh                           ...     ...     Petitioner
                         Versus
           The State of Jharkhand & Ors.                 ...     ...     Respondents
                               -----
           CORAM:        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD
                               -----
           For the Petitioner        : Mr. Ajit Kumar & Prabhat Singh, Advocates
           For the respondents       : J.C. to G.P.I.
                               -----
02/29.07.2011

. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in

accordance with norm of promotion prevailing at the relevant point of time, the

petitioner was promoted to the post of Head Master w.e.f. 08.10.1986.

Subsequently, vide order dated 12.06.2003, the date of the promotion was shifted

from 08.10.86 to 01.04.1982 but the payment on promotional scale for that

period was not to be made. The petitioner after the order of promotion, was

drawing salary in the scale payable to Headmaster but suddenly, an order was

passed as contained in Memo No.4026 dated 31.12.2007 (Annexure-4), whereby

the petitioner was restrained from drawing salary in the said scale. Thereafter on

31.03.2008, the petitioner got retired and then in the year 2009, an order was

passed as contained in Memo No.2256 dated 10.10.2009 (Annexure-5) whereby

recovery was ordered to be made in 24 installments of the amount, which had

been drawn by the petitioner in promoted scale, which order has been challenged

to be bad, as the Government does not have any authority to recover the amount

from the pensionery benefit, without drawing any proceeding.

However, learned counsel appearing for the State seeks time to

seek instruction and to file counter affidavit.

Let this matter be listed after three weeks.

Meanwhile, the order as contained in Memo No.2256 dated

10.10.2009 (Annexure-5) shall not be given effect to, so far it relates to the

petitioner.

Meanwhile, it would be open for the authority to make payment of

the admitted retiral dues.

(R.R. Prasad, J.)

Ravi/