High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Suresh Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 22 November, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Suresh Prasad vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 22 November, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            CWJC No.9828 of 2006
                               SURESH PRASAD
                                   Versus
                          THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
                                -----------

For the Petitioner: None
For the State of Bihar: Mr. D.Kumar AC to SC-5
For the State of Jharkhand:Mr. Dhurba Mukherjee,Advocate
For the A.G. Jharkhand: Mr. L.P.K.Rajgrihar, Addl.

Standing counsel.

———–

2 22.11.2010 This writ application has been filed by the

petitioner for grant of benefit of first ACP and the corresponding

revision in the pay scale for the period 9.8.99 to 14.11.2000 from

the State of Bihar. That benefit has already been given to the

petitioner after 15.11.2000 that is the date when the Jharkhand

State was created on bifurcation.

No counter affidavit has been filed in the last four

years since the writ application was pending. However counter

affidavits on behalf of the State of Jharkhand and on behalf of the

Accountant General, Jharkhand have been filed. The necessary

notification is already there on record which has been issued by

the State of Jharkhand giving the benefit of 1st ACP.

Looking at the inaction on the part of the authority

of the State of Bihar, this writ application is disposed of with a

direction upon the Principal Secretary-cum-Commissioner (Home)

Police Department that he will look into the matter with regard to

grant of benefit of ACP for the period 9.8.1999 to 14.11.2000

taking into consideration the Notification No. 556 dated 22nd

February, 2005 annexed as annexure-5 and do the needful within a

period of four months from the date of communication/production
-2-

of a copy of this order.

So far the grant of increment is concerned, no

order is given in this regard because withholding of increment is

fall out of the punishment imposed upon him.

This writ application is disposed of with the above

direction.

RPS                  (Ajay Kumar Tripathi,J.)