High Court Kerala High Court

Suresh vs The State Of Kerala on 10 December, 2007

Kerala High Court
Suresh vs The State Of Kerala on 10 December, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 7532 of 2007()


1. SURESH, AGED 25,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE STATE OF KERALA,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :10/12/2007

 O R D E R
                            R. BASANT, J.
                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                     B.A.No. 7532 of 2007
                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
           Dated this the 10th day of December, 2007

                               O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner faces

allegations in a crime registered for offences punishable, inter

alia, under Sections 420, 406 and 376 I.P.C. The crux of the

allegations is that the petitioner had sexual relationship with the

defacto complainant from the year 2003. They were allegedly in

love. But the petitioner did not comply with the promise to

marry her. This obliged the defacto to file the complaint before

various authorities. At last crime has been registered.

Investigation is in progress. The petitioner apprehends imminent

arrest.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at

worst, even accepting the entire allegations, it was only a case of

consensus pre-marital sex and later reluctance to marry the

woman. In any view of the matter, there is no element of offence

B.A.No. 7532 of 2007
2

of rape or cheating in this case. He may be granted anticipatory bail,

prays the counsel.

3. The learned Prosecutor does not oppose the application.

Considering the totality of circumstances, I am satisfied that this is a fit

case where the petitioner can be granted anticipatory bail, subject of

course to appropriate conditions, which shall safeguard the interests of

a fair, efficient and expeditious investigation.

4. In the result:

(1) This application is allowed.

(2) The following directions are issued under Section 438

Cr.P.C.

(a) The petitioner shall surrender before the learned Magistrate

on 17.12.2007 at 11 a.m. The learned Magistrate shall release the

petitioner on regular bail on condition that he executes a bond for

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent

B.A.No. 7532 of 2007
3

sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned

Magistrate.

(b) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation

before the Investigating Officer between 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. on

18.12.2007 and 19.12.2007. During this period the petitioner can be

interrogated in custody and all necessary steps in investigation,

including the potency test can be conducted by the Investigating

Officer. Thereafter he shall appear before the Investigating Officer on

all Mondays and Fridays between 10 a.m. and 12 noon for a period of

two months and subsequently as and when directed by the

Investigating Officer in writing to do so.

(c) If the petitioner does not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (1) above, these directions shall lapse

on 17.12.07 and the police shall be at liberty thereafter to arrest the

petitioner and deal with him in accordance with law.

B.A.No. 7532 of 2007
4

(d) If the petitioner were arrested prior to his surrender on

17.12.2007 as directed in clause (1) above, he shall be released on bail

on his executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- without any surety

undertaking to appear before the learned Magistrate on 17.12.2007.

(R. BASANT)
Judge

tm