High Court Kerala High Court

Suresh vs The Tahsildar on 6 March, 2008

Kerala High Court
Suresh vs The Tahsildar on 6 March, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 983 of 2008()


1. SURESH, S/O.SREEDHARAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE TAHSILDAR, NILAMBUR.
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.SAMSUDIN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :06/03/2008

 O R D E R
                         V. RAMKUMAR, J
                    ......................................
                    Crl.M.C.No.987 of 2008
                    ......................................

                     Dated: 06 - 03 - 2008

                              O R D E R

Heard both sides.

2. In the light of the common order dated 25.02.2008

passed in Crl.M.C No. 543 of 2008 and connected cases, It is

held that the learned Magistrate was not justified in refusing to

entertain the petition filed under Sec. 457 Cr.P.C. The petitioner

are permitted to apply again before the learned Magistrate who

shall release the tractor in question on interim custody on the

petitioner making a cash deposit for Rs. 35,000/- (Rupees thirty

five thousand only) and executing a bond for Rs.6,00,000/-

(Rupees six lakhs only) with two solvent sureties each for the

like amount (without insisting on solvency certificate from such

sureties) to the satisfaction of the Magistrate and on the

petitioner giving an undertaking on the following terms:-

Crl.M.C.No.983 of 2008

1. The petitioner shall not permit the user of
the tractor for any illicit purpose

2. The petitioner shall not transfer wholly or in
part the tractor to any other person.

3. The petitioner shall produce the tractor
before the Magistrate as and when directed to
do so in the same condition in which it is
released to him.

4. The interim custody of the tractor shall be
subject to final orders, if any, to be passed for
confiscation.

This Crl.M.C. is disposed of as above.

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

sj

Crl.M.C.No.983 of 2008