Gujarat High Court High Court

Sureshbhai vs State on 28 October, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Sureshbhai vs State on 28 October, 2010
Author: Jayant Patel,&Nbsp;Honourable H.B.Antani,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/11446/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 11446 of 2010
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 1030 of 2008
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

SURESHBHAI
RATILAL CHAUHAN - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
THROUGH
JAIL for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR LR PUJARI, APP for Respondent(s) : 1, 
None
for Respondent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 28/10/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL)

The
present application has been preferred by the applicant –
convict for releasing on temporary bail on the ground that he wants
to perform post-death ceremony of his father and separation of the
property.

Pursuant
to the earlier order passed by this Court, the report has been
submitted the learned APP and as per the said report, the ground is
genuine, but the apprehension of law and order is voiced without
there being any basis. The jail report shows that he was released
on furlough and he has surrendered in time.

Under
these circumstances, the applicant – convict be released on
temporary bail for a period of two weeks from the date of his actual
release on condition that he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.5,000/-
with the further direction that upon the expiry of the bail period,
he shall surrender before the concerned jail authority.

The
application is allowed to the aforesaid extent. Rule made absolute
accordingly. Office to intimate the concerned jail authority.

(Jayant
Patel, J.)

(H.

B. Antani, J.)

vinod

   

Top