Sureshkumar vs State Of Kerala on 11 February, 2011

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 966 of 2011()


1. SURESHKUMAR, AGED 41 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, WADAKKANCHERY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :11/02/2011

 O R D E R
                         V. RAMKUMAR, J.
              ----------------------------------------------
               Bail Application No.966 of 2011
             -----------------------------------------------
          Dated this the 11th day of February, 2011

                                ORDER

In this Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the

petitioner, who is the sole accused in Cr.No.67 of 2011 of

Wadakkanchery Police Station for offences punishable under

Sections 323, 324 & 308 read with Section 34 I.P.C., seeks his

enlargement on bail. The petitioner surrendered on 30/01/2011.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the offences, the

duration of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner, the

present stage of investigation of the case and the other

circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the

petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released

on bail with effect from 21/02/2011 on his executing a bond for

`15,000/- (Rupees fifteen thousand only) with two solvent

sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the

Magistrate concerned and subject to the following conditions:-

Bail Appln.No.966/2011
-2-

1. The petitioner shall report before the

Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and

11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. The petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation as and when required by the

police at any time till the filing of the final

report.

3. The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate

the prosecution witnesses nor shall he

attempt to tamper with the evidence for the

prosecution.

4. The petitioner shall not commit any offence

while on bail.

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above

conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

This application is allowed as above.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

skj