High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Surinder Mohan Thakur vs State Of Punjab & Another on 3 October, 2008

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Surinder Mohan Thakur vs State Of Punjab & Another on 3 October, 2008
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH



                          Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-19544 of 2008
                                       Date of Decision: October 03, 2008


Surinder Mohan Thakur
                                                              .....PETITIONER(S)

                                     VERSUS


State of Punjab & Another
                                                            .....RESPONDENT(S)
                                 .      .      .


CORAM:            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA


PRESENT: -        Mr. B.S. Walia, Advocate, for the
                  petitioner.

                  Mr. H.S. Brar,               Deputy        Advocate
                  General, Punjab.

                  Mr. Anil Shukla,                 Advocate,        for
                  respondent No.2.


                                 .      .      .

AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)

                   This     petition          has      been       filed     under

Section     482    Cr.P.C.       for        quashing        FIR   No.51     dated

19.4.2008     lodged       for       commission        of     offences     under

Sections 406 and 420 IPC, with Police Station, Sadar,

Kapurthala and all consequential proceedings arising

therefrom, on the basis of compromise.

Contention is that it was a dispute for

money. Respondent No.2-complainant has already received

the amount viz. Rs.3 lac. Affidavit has been filed on

behalf of respondent No.2-complainant, Darshan Singh,
Crl. Misc. No. M-19544 of 2008 [2]

sworn on 3.10.2008 wherein it has categorically been

stated that the complainant does not want to pursue the

case against the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the respondent-State,

on instructions from Sucha Singh, Assistant Sub

Inspector, states that the parties indeed have entered

into compromise.

Having regard to the nature of disputes;

the amount due towards the complainant having already

paid; complainant having endorsed the factum of

compromise and a clear statement made that he is not

interested in pursing the prosecution of the petitioner

and continuance of proceedings would not serve any

purpose in law, this petition is allowed.

FIR No.51 dated 19.4.2008 lodged for

commission of offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC,

with Police Station, Sadar, Kapurthala and all

consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby

quashed.


                                                              (AJAI LAMBA)
October 03, 2008                                                 JUDGE
avin