IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Cr.Misc. 26925 M of 2008
DATE OF DECISION :21.1.2009
Surjit Singh and another
......PETITIONER
VERSUS
State of Punjab and another
......RESPONDENTS
PRESENT: Mr. PS Bhangul, Advocate
Ms.Rajni Gupta, DAG, Pb.
Mr. HS Tuli, Advocate
M.M.S.BEDI,J.
Pursuant to the interim order, the petitioners have already put
in appearance before the trial court. Charges have also been framed.
Learned counsel for the complainant has opposed the petition.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties. Since the
petitioners have already appeared before the trial court to face trial in
accordance with law pursuant to the interim order and there are arguable
legal and factual points to be determined during trial, without expression of
any opinion on merits of the case regarding the said disputed questions,
lest it should prejudice the right of the petitioners , this petition is allowed
and interim order dated 20.10.2008 is hereby confirmed subject to the
condition that the petitioners will continue to appear before the trial Court
and will not absent themselves without any sufficient cause.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, it will be
open to the trial court to cancel the bail bonds.
January 21 ,2006 ( M.M.S.BEDI ) TSM JUDGE