High Court Punjab-Haryana High Court

Surjit Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 16 January, 2009

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Surjit Singh vs State Of Punjab And Another on 16 January, 2009
 CRM No. M-32666 of 2008                                    1



    IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB &
              HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

                                  CRM No. M-32666 of 2008
                                  Date of decision: 16.01.2009

Surjit Singh                                         ...Petitioner

                                 Versus

State of Punjab and another                          ...Respondents


CORAM:         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present:-      Mr. T.P.S. Bhatti, Advocate, for the petitioner.
               Mr. Shailesh Gupta, DAG, Punjab for respondent No.1.
               Dr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocate, for respondent No.2.

Rajan Gupta, J.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482

Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.83 dated 22nd April, 2008, under

Section 420 IPC, registered at Police Station Phillaur, District

Jalandhar (Annexure P-1) and the subsequent proceedings arising

therefrom, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2) arrived at

between the parties.

Complainant/respondent No.2 is present in Court. She is

duly identified by her counsel. She has filed an affidavit, admitting

therein the factum of com promise (Annexure P-1) arrived at between

the parties. She states that she has no objection if the present FIR is

quashed.

The compromise is in the interest of the parties and after the
CRM No. M-32666 of 2008 2

matter has been resolved by an amicable settlement, no useful purpose is

likely to be served with continuance of the criminal proceedings, which

would be a futile exercise.

In view of the above, the present FIR and the consequent

proceedings deserve to be quashed in the light of the decision of Full

Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of

Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052.

Resultantly, the present petition is allowed, the FIR and the

subsequent proceedings arising thereof are quashed.

(RAJAN GUPTA)
JUDGE
January 16, 2009
‘rajpal’