High Court Karnataka High Court

Susheelamma vs Smt Keerthi Tivari on 6 September, 2010

Karnataka High Court
Susheelamma vs Smt Keerthi Tivari on 6 September, 2010
Author: J.S.Khehar(Cj) And Chellur


1

‘ii? TEE E%IGE”¥ CQURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGQIORE

EATES TEES ME am my OF SEP’FEMBER.’2Qf-§_ G
FRESENT “”j%”

THE? HflN’BLE MR.3.s.§N’BLE MRS.J?JS§§E’Q,E §w§mE’§}fLE14§§.:v_{,5§€£ELi.;E3R %

ccc Ne. 45AE”;;!.u2A'{;’.1{}–._f_Civ.il’§”

831′ WEEN :

,. _ : _

Sm’. 8%.§s§iEE:.L;s_MM;A, _ %
W/{J LATE: Si.M;;.fBASAVA1¥’EAJ;’
AGED Aasmi §.Q’IV’yE4{&RS’§.’ V ;
R/Q ‘N91, :::}§o ss$-,v ._£\_fIA,I?;\I’,
B.”1″,M; LA’:’«Q?;fF, _Si!f1’aGE,_
BANG%a.L0;’%E+~:–:€h_ ” ‘ % %

. .. COMPLAINANT

{BY SR1 C;Lf:§L;*mJ A§x;:§LTi<ARNI, ADV. ,1

TEVARI

AC}EIE:: A3103? 5:) YEARS,
A;::<3Q':,INTAN'? GENERAL,
;3&"e3;& E, PENSION DMSION,
I€'Aif€NATAKA, BANGAL(3RE~ 1,

.* ;'3.N. JAYARAM,

§~'A'§'HER NfiME Nff)?' KNQWN,
AGED ABQUT 55 YEARS,
THE iNSPECT€f)§R GENERAL
OF' REGISTRATION ARE}
COMM¥SSIGNER OF STAMFE,
E530. '?'2Q, SHZMSHA BHAVAN,

W

–.—J

2.-

46″? CROSS, 873 BLQCEK,

J’AYANA€}AR, ;3A.N’GALv:’3RE.
ACCUSED

{BY SEE VS. HEGDE, AGA FOR A1 8:. 2)

THIS ace IS FILED UNBER SECTIQNS ANI} A
12 OF THE CQNTEMPF QF CC>{E7R’?T__AC’I’ PRAY'{E*$’C}_’AT(}_ ”
RENISEI THE RESPQNDENT BY f:;§\E£T’§A?:1’€G’1CQ_NTE_ME’T V
?ROC:EEDENGS AGAMST T}§E3″1 RT§8f?ON.UEN’I”f 5§~*8EY1NG THE: (§Rii3E3f€ 0}?’ T7I7%{7£S’ <::<3m09 PASSfi£,?};§””~V..§§’€ WE.E'{Q§3;_1″i.54′,’~2′{}C}9 *

‘V’IDE2 ANNEXURE»-‘C.

mxs <::<:;<::: cmgrm 0:4 F:Q'§?.._V_O:VR{}ERS 'fiéi:s DAY,
<:H:£«:zr JL:sT':r::E MADE"I'§iE'E7f®1.;L{§EE?i§§€ti%..:

a.s.§<EEHgg§';kT'<:,,.%§,%T%:?Q§g3i~., I

. gin,-t:<.g;fx1*z1€';ti..,::{',a't:i1sé-3. fix? the complainant. opetitioxler

i:"i1;zVi"E€{i 3.-'};:L¥.:_::9"a.~M7€j_fr:ez1'£i<:+1'1 to the meme for settletnent filed on

, therewith, a photacapy of Pay Order

<ia t¥£:::1 R}, depiciing paynmnt of R3.4,4%-23,379/~ by

V "'Lhe_. aéictiised «respo1"1de:1ts 1:0 the complainant »-

_' petiéiéner.

2. In View of the aforesaid Pay Order, it is the

Qfifiifififififi sf {ha Eearzmd ceunssl far the aozagplainant –

pfitiftioziei”, ‘aha: the instgmi conieanpt petition has beer:
;:<iz1de::r:ed if1'fF11CE1}{}'i.3.S, iiiasmiich as, the oraéer ciétsd

;23,1%.2009 has bfififfl complied With.

3. in View cf the above, _;t§.1e__ –:%.”_:::fi:i:e:’11,ptL.v

getition is disposed of, as héévirzg” ~”be'”e.n'” _{9€:zf:u:3»z9é*1=§E’:£*f.:

imfructxious. 9roz:eediI1gs ixfiiiaigd ag3iI;$t :’i;11e’v._é:6au$ed

wnespondexxts are drep;;2ed.

.Ifi<i€X':*§'€s/