Swamy Construction Company vs M/S Shrishma Fine Chemicals And … on 24 July, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAICA, BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 24'1"" DAY OF JULY, 2008 - 

BEFORE

Tim I~ION'BL1:'3 MR. JUSTICE RAM  T  Q 
COMPADLZ AjPI.ICA'I'IOL1   13    

COMPANY PETI'rf5N N( );5S--(§F  "  %
BETWEEN %  V V. V' 

M] S. SWAMY cox~xs*rR.:3*c1*Iore"€i0i-;»iin§m:
BANGALORE.  _ ~_   

 """     APPLICANT
(By sxga : S R s:--azvApRAtgAs1g:t Axav)
AND, 1 .    %  .

M/s+.sHR1siiM§A Finis: 'CHEMICALS AND
pHA12MAcEUTxcAL$__§_' .

' V'  -(KARN»:i'AKA1 LTD
No». .1] 1, % SHIVAPRASAD COMPLEX

 ..Mi.}.SE£J M._«ROA1)_.j.. BANGALORE - 1.

.A  __    RESPONDENT

(Ejy_M[S..K2?gS’I1}RI ASSOCIATES, ADV)

‘ ” — ERTQPOSED RESPONDENT:

T”‘w w.s:§’\.-‘EAL PHARMA ummn
:s:o.21 AND 22, BOMMASANDRA

IIQDUSTRIAL AREA, HOSUR ROAD

” “BANGALORE, RERBY rrs
‘ company smcrzmamr sm. MAHADEVAN.

(BY SRI. VINOD KUMAR B.N. ADV. — ABSENT) Q <

THIS APPLICATION IS FILED UNDER ORI}E–Rj1 _1e:;:LIs.
10 cm R/W 3.151 cm R/W RULES 6 M9 gtmrria
coupamms (mum RULES 1959 pRAv1:stG"qfo..f?ER;~m* 'A
THE PROPOSED RESPONDENT To. _C€)ME 0zsij REm”) ”

AND ETC.

THIS APPLICATION, comm 0._l.’J FdR%”HEAR’im,’%–.k

THIS DAY THE 0001?? MAnF;frH__E FOLLOWING:

_.s..2_°        
There is no  implcadmg'

applicant     Hence, the

application  ,  V 

sale
Iuaqe