High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Swarn Deep Yadav @ Swarndeep Kumar vs State Of Bihar on 9 July, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Swarn Deep Yadav @ Swarndeep Kumar vs State Of Bihar on 9 July, 2010
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Cr.Misc. No.22419 of 2010
          SWARN DEEP YADAV @ SWARNDEEP KUMAR, SON OF SRI
          CHANDRA SHEKHAR SINGH
                                          Versus
                                   STATE OF BIHAR
                                        -----------

2. 09.07.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under Sections 366A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation in the First Information Report is that

his niece aged about 16 years had been kidnapped by the co-

accused. The petitioner was not named initially but

subsequently, some witnesses stated that he was also

responsible for the alleged kidnapping.

Considering the nature of allegation as also that the

petitioner is a young boy, let the petitioner above named, be

released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five

thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnia, in K. Hat

(Madhubani) P.S. Case No. 98 of 2010 subject to the following

conditions: (i)That one of the bailors will be a close relative of

the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to

how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to

furnish information to the court about any change in address of

the petitioner. (ii)That the affidavit shall clearly state that the

petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he
2

shall not be released on bail. (iii)That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given

date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to

do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his

bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That

the petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he

fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to

be cancelled.

( Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali