Syed Imitaz Ali vs Director Of Municipal on 15 December, 2008

 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

CIRCUIT BENCHAT GULB.--{R(Z4

{)ATE'.D THIS THE 15"' DAY 01? D:e.a"iEz;s:r3:§;*1I%A20_e52f' ' 5  V:  

BE-FORE _

THE HOJWBLE MRJUSTICE si--V;.,}L4:;23'gDL?.i ;'V;<£ZE_PfR  

mar PETITI02\".;'§'{?i?9.3§{29?3iS  é '

Between:

Syed Irnitaz Ali, 3

S50 Syed Nasser .»='31i.?,  é  _ 

Aged about 23 j,='e£<:'s,  H  . 
Geo; SBA (Da_iijyi$ar'g¢),;"' V:.,__ _ , 
Netifed Area'VComfr:it:5ag,  '
Hu£:iGoi::1 MiI1e3.,' V V . ~ * _  ..
Hutti(P1:r3 Par.¢:£z,a§.!at),- V     
Liz1gasuguz'TaIUI'L.._ "   " a

Raichur Dififlfiet.      '  Peiiiiaxiezz

'By Sr:  I<;a£i¢f§«fi3f;";¥1;$v.}

A11fi:, __ 

"~' ' I Dizjéctorof 23%.-uh£cipai Adtninistratien,

  ~ '  :i

V V.'\-91  AI111)BdIs;a£' Road,
 Bangafivsme.

  Bepizgr Corgxrnissiener,
Raicizur I}iSt1'is:I.

 V ' v 3  ifhieffifiicsr,

otifzed Area Ccnnzzzjttea,
Hufii Gesid Mineg,

Hum, Lizzgasugur Taiuk,
Raichztr Disirict.



IN)

4 Chief Qfiicezi,
Fura Pazzchayat EV-iudgoi,
Lingasugtir Taiuk,
Raicizur District.  Respotlciezzts.

{By Sri SS. Kumman, .%GA for R1 & R2)

This Wait Petitian is flied under Articles 2226 ZJE; 1212'? é3f_th2:_ _
Constitution of India, praying in quash the impugzzed 'order 1da*;.e:iv

2{~:'-.;2.2Gi3S passed by R3. etc.

This Writ Petition cemizig -:m,----f:3~r  ':1-53.55, thé'{Z1',--~.ur:~"

made the foliowing:

_0RDE.??..   

In this €£iSf.§V,"§'fiVé'v? 'peiifio:1é§V ' Caagied igfiéstéen the notice at
.'5§I§}'?.€XQI'€  dated   the third respondent

whereby the p-3ti£i his apptgeintmenfn

‘ 2, I Iiaasg h¢3ré.§§§~eA£eamed Ceunssafl fer the pafiies.

.4 isfihe fcaée Qfthe gcuetitioner that the third respmfxéent has

.a §:;3§§.h._£§t§ fifim is the post in quegtic-:1 and $3: the eariier Chief

the Council had appeinteé him :9 {ha said pest’

_}’%.zm é:%i;1re ‘F’ £3 99%}; a notice énfemniag the §’}€fiI§€}I1€F fizz}; he was;

ix