High Court Kerala High Court

Syrus vs State Of Kerala Rep.By Public … on 19 May, 2009

Kerala High Court
Syrus vs State Of Kerala Rep.By Public … on 19 May, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 2656 of 2009()


1. SYRUS,S/O.DAVEED,THOTTINKARA VEEDU,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN

 Dated :19/05/2009

 O R D E R
                         P.S.GOPINATHAN, J.
           ======================================
                        B.A.No.2656 of 2009
            ======================================
                 Dated this the 19th day of May 2009

                               ORDER

The petitioner is the second accused in C.R.No.36 of 2009

of Aryanad Excise Range for the offences under Sections 8(1)

and 8(2) and 55(b) and 55(g) of the Abkari Act. On 15.4.2009,

the petitioner was found engaged in distilling illicit arrack. 10.5

litres of arrack and 250 litres of wash were recovered and the

petitioner was produced before the Judicial First Class

Magistrate II, Nedumangad. He was remanded to judicial

custody. His application for bail was dismissed. Now this

petition.

2. When this petition came up for hearing, the learned

Public Prosecutor submitted that bail may be granted on

stringent conditions with effect from 27.5.2009.

3. In the result, this petition is allowed and it is ordered

that the petitioner shall be released on bail on executing a bond

for Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand only) with two solvent

sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Judicial

First Class Magistrate II, Nedumangad on or after 27.5.2009 on

the following conditions:-

B.A.No.2656 of 2009 2

(i) The petitioner shall report before the

investigating officer at 10 a.m. on every Tuesday

and Friday.

ii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly

make any inducement, threat or promise to any

person acquainted with the facts of the case so as

to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the

Court or to any police officer.

P.S.GOPINATHAN, JUDGE

css/