IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 867 of 2011(G)
1. T.G.SHAJI, AGED 41 YEARS,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. JOSE, POTTAKKA HOUSE,MURINGOOR P.O.,
... Respondent
2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,
3. DISTRICT GEOLOGIST,
4. TAHSILDAR,TALUK OFFICE,
5. VILLAGE OFFICER,
6. MELOOR GRAMAPANCHAYATH
7. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
8. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
For Petitioner :SRI.V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :24/01/2011
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
-------------------------
W.P (C) No. 867 of 2011
--------------------------
Dated this the 24th January, 2011
J U D G M E N T
The only request made by the petitioner is to direct
the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P1 where the petitioner
has made allegation against the 1st respondent of having
resorted to the illegal clay mining. It is stated that though
such a complaint has been made, the 2nd respondent has
not taken any action in the matter.
2. Now that such an allegation has been raised by
the petitioner, without expressing anything on the merits
of the claim made by the petitioner and leaving it entirely
open to the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action in
the matter, in accordance with law and with notice to the
1st respondent. It is directed that decision in the matter
as above shall be taken, as expeditiously as possible, at
any rate, within six weeks of production of a copy of this
judgment along with a copy of the writ petition.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
ANTONY DOMINIC
JUDGE
ma
/True copy/ P.A to Judge
W.P (C) No. 2010
2