High Court Kerala High Court

T.G.Vijayan vs State Of Kerala on 21 March, 2007

Kerala High Court
T.G.Vijayan vs State Of Kerala on 21 March, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 824 of 2007()



1. T.G.VIJAYAN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :21/03/2007

 O R D E R
                                  R. BASANT, J.

                         - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

                          Crl.M.C.No. 824  of   2007

                         - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

                   Dated this the 21st day of   March, 2007


                                      O R D E R

The petitioner faces indictment in a prosecution under Section

138 of the N.I. Act. He has not entered appearance. According to

him, he did not receive any summons. The learned Magistrate issued

non-bailable warrant to procure his presence. He is willing to

surrender before the learned Magistrate. But he apprehends that his

application for bail may not be considered by the learned Magistrate

on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. It is in these

circumstances prayed that appropriate directions may be issued to the

learned Magistrate to release the petitioner on bail on the date of

surrender itself.

2. It is certainly for the petitioner to appear before the learned

Magistrate and explain to the learned Magistrate the circumstances

under which he could not earlier appear before the learned

Magistrate. I have no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate

would not consider the application for bail on merits, in accordance

with law and expeditiously. Every court must do the same. No

Crl.M.C.No. 824 of 2007

2

special or specific direction appears to be necessary. Sufficient general

directions have already been issued by this Court in the decision in Alice

George v. Dy.S.P. of Police (2003 (1) KLT 339).

3. This Crl.M.C. is accordingly dismissed, but subject to the above

observations/directions. I may hasten to observe that if the petitioner

appears before the learned Magistrate and applies for bail after giving

sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned

Magistrate must proceed to pass orders on merits, in accordance with law

and expeditiously – on the date of surrender itself.

4. Hand over copy of the order.

(R. BASANT)

Judge

tm