1
:64′
113 THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARIIATAKA. AT BANGALORE
M.F.A.NO.5505/2002
DATED TI-H8 THE 673 DAY OF’ JUW 2008
BEFORE
THE nonrnm xxmsncn ‘ F’
M.F.A. No.55o5z2oc§_g
BETWEEK:
1
T N VIKAS s/o ‘1’ C NAGARAJA’
22 was –
R/O 13.0 2745f1′.?B;. .
‘ASHRAYA’,_ii_FLQ<3R _ ._
13TH MAIN reogzz-~
HALII sTA<;E.~:fi__ " '
BANGALORE~._
APPELLANT
{BY SR1 is/1'?REVAl§I1i'SID:Dx'\$H.«&–. ' 7
gm H M 'SHWANA(}Ol;i~DA,..¢i)VS. – ABSENT)
AND:
– ‘RAJaACiOPAL_S/O igéffi NARAYANAPPA
‘-:57:-?:,s-. ‘
A “1210: ¥.?E§«;l’~kYVA-.I:vi£sIN ROAD
._ S’iJ_NKA:i3&KA”‘§?I’E
“\’}SWANEEi}AM ms?
BANGALORE 9:
AA SAMPARGA S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA
.. 33-‘ms
* R19’ PEENYA MAIN ROAD
gsUNKADAK;A’I’1*E
TWSWANEEDAM POST
‘ ” BANGALORE 9}
PRAKASH S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA
36 YRS
R/O PEENYA MAiN ROAD
SUNKADAKATPE
M.F.A.NO.5505/ 2002
VISWANEEDAM POST
BANGALGRE 91 REsPoNDLfi§’T$AAJ:’V: ”
(BY SR: N R JAYAPRAKASH, ADV. FOR C/Rf: 85 3-, «
SR1 s N BHAT 85 SR! N RAGHUPATHY, &,D\?S-.. J
FOR R2; APFEAL msmsssu AGAINST R1)
THIS MFA man U/0 43 R 1(.{i_ ‘R,/w é1’«; U/0’39}? 1
ANDQOF cm FOR’I’.I. ,
mzs APPEAL COMING o;{_V’FQR7Ar§M1ssi01§i Ti-IIS BAY,
THE comm’ DELIVERED THE ;~’oLua}vm«:3.;:.__% V
None ‘V«:.;f9;_-E though the
appeal is Hence, the appeal
is dismissed éféru
Sd/..;
Judge