High Court Karnataka High Court

T Neelakantappa vs N Balasubramaniam on 28 July, 2008

Karnataka High Court
T Neelakantappa vs N Balasubramaniam on 28 July, 2008
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
nu THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT   

DATED THIS THE 23*"    AA
BEFORE  %  % " %  
THE HON'BLE m2.JusTIcE sHA$:rAQAmubAn
CRIMINAI. 

etwee : é

T.Neelakantappa in "  _ 
Aged aboutf55  . ' 

Plot Ncj»'.403; Bsmpeizjj 'Lakca " _
No.S5fi--[ S51  .
353* Main, 4?') {3m&s"~   ..  ,
B.T.M.Layout, V " f ,. 

Ba1185.'1°"e~5€»O 078'.-_  " .. Petitioner

 *  _ (  Advocate)

N,B'a};asuhi"ané'amaInT,. V' '

Agexgl abcsm years
S] 0 Rfisnciakt-.1mar

  No.Y- 159; Third Street,
* _"C.h¢_n:nai~600 O40. .. Respondent

-pa-_..

This Criminal Petitinn is filed under Section 482 of

Cr.P.C.. praying to set aside the older of dismissal dated

28.3.2007 in C.C.No.19553/2003 passed by the 19′-‘5

Add1.C.M.M. Bangalore, by aliowing the above by
oonvkrting the respondent. A’

This Czimixxal Petition coming on for 4′

the (301111: made the following :

Notice to Iespondent’ _is-~ diepexztfis-ed’

impugned order is passed te’ the order

to be passed in this the respondents

on the merits of the ma, ea”. _ V

2. ‘n;d¢rj«’e_da:,aa 23.3.2007 passed in

C..C.No. 19553;2o03,, has dismissed the
cc:-Inplaint as ‘fa. ‘take flesh steps for getting

the pmc}aI;1;§tib1; V’ V”

does not take steps, it is, but, natural

the ” ta dismiss the matter for default.

_ Flflyerefore, 6 rdeV1’4 of the Caourt below cannot be said to be at

«i’san1t…fHen#ever certain

mace
“L,

zeasonings are assigned in this

by the petitiener far not taldng steps fer

. _getiifiV1Vg”{he proclamation issued. Accepting the cause shown,

W3

– 3 .

this Court prefers to set aside the imptigmrsd cntier by imposing

costs on the complainant. Hence, the foiiowing order is made: :
The onier dated 28.3.2007 passed by the lsearned 19″‘

Addl. Chicf Metropolitan Magistxats, Bangalolfg; ” * T . in

C.C.No.195S3/2003, is quashed. c.c.No.19553,I’:gc$£};s”.;*

restored to the file of the Court below. The K

subject to deposit of costs of Rs.

Bangalore Mediation Oentw. Ba_I1gaI#5:r;:’withiz;. b’,.”ifh I’ee” fiéééizé’

fium today. It is made clear V

three Wefika, auttfitaaticafly and the mder of
the Cami “Without any furthazr ordsrs. If

the (most is inciifioned above, the petitioner shall

the c§fi:’+t”‘b¢1ow on am September 2003 at 11.90

amgf

aaspw ofaccmdingly.

Sd/-

Judge

-b:<z