IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 36479 of 2008(P)
1. T.VIJI WILLIAMS, W/O.C.C.YELDHO MATHOOSE
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent
2. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
3. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,
4. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, MALABAR
5. THE HEADMASTER, S.C.U.P.SCHOOL,
6. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION
7. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
For Petitioner :SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :11/12/2008
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J
-----------------------------------------------------------
W.P.(C).No.36479/2008
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dated this the 11th day of December, 2008
JUDGMENT
By Ext.P1 order, the 4th respondent appointed the
petitioner as LPSA, with effect from 1.6.2007.
Subsequently, by Ext.P2 order, with effect from 16.7.2007,
the petitioner was transferred to another school under the
same management within the Trithala Educational Sub
District. According to the petitioner, though a proposal for
approval was made to the 3rd respondent, in Ext.P4
communication the 3rd respondent took the stand that
certain documents for considering the request for approval
were not received and therefore he is not in a position to
consider the same. Petitioner submits that, the documents
were still available with the Manager and the representation
made to him did not evoke any result. In these
WP(c).No.36479/08 2
circumstances, the petitioner approached the 6th
respondent by filing Ext.P7 and in this writ petition what is
sought for is a direction to the 6th respondent to consider
and pass orders on Ext.P7, taking note of Ext.P1, by which,
approval was granted by the 2nd respondent for his initial
appointment.
2. Having regard to the aforesaid factual situation and
taking note of the fact that Ext.P7 has been filed before the
6th respondent invoking the power under Rule 8-A of
chapter XIV-A KER, it is for the 6th respondent to consider
and pass orders on Ext.P7 with notice to the petitioner and
the 4th respondent. This shall be done as expeditiously as
possible and at any rate within 8 weeks from the date of
production of a copy of the judgment along with a copy of
the writ petition.
Petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along
with a copy of the writ petition before the 6th respondent
for compliance.
ANTONY DOMINIC
JUDGE
vi.
WP(c).No.36479/08 3