High Court Karnataka High Court

Tarapur K G S/O Gangappa Tarapur, vs The Director, Apmc, Anr on 19 December, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Tarapur K G S/O Gangappa Tarapur, vs The Director, Apmc, Anr on 19 December, 2008
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer
 And:

{N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

CIRC'L?ITB.&'NCHATGULBARCE4   F"  M

DATED THIS THE :97" BM 0:?    " 

BEF{)R_E_

THE HQAPBLEMR.JLrsT1C£*«$§';43.oUL  

WRIT P.g*__T1?1arswo.¢4m§922:1oeé"g:4fia4Cg'° 

Between:

K.G_Ta:apu1:       

Sfolate Gangappa "     2"  »

Aged about 52 j;*ears,", ' ' '

Occ;busi11ess., "   

Rio Si;1dgiTI'aiui§"~_V % _   

Bi_§aPl11'Di$f:?it2I;. ' V V'     ' '  Petitiouei'.

(By Smt. Hetnaig'  

 » ; Th¢ :')Virer:t£:f;"'v ._

_ Agriciiihué Prztyduct Market C5o11n11ittee,
" B'zz1igaio1'e';Lj -- 

 421 Tfié fiégrfiefiitumi Produce Market Conuniflee,

 AA Sizidlmagi,
Bygjts SecretaryfChairman,

'  "Sindhagi.  Resp<:v11de:1:s.

  V   M. Kumar, AGA far R1
   Sri S18" I~'§Lumzna11., Adv: for R2")



 

4. I have carefully at-ansidered the arguments of the learned

Counsei far the parties made at the Bar and perused thejir:c§.f'e;:i'rz£s

placed on recerd.

5. Materials on recoré dearly diécloétiiai {fie ._

and Secmetaxy cf the 2"' respo11de11:"i'm"<.*e: eéiafluteii tige éalé' éiéed as V

per Aunexure-A £n respercflof th'eV's'iie §'22 i§a§§£ion '£r:"fzw{§11r of the
petitioner' If £3 evident fiiai pfopefiy has been

transferred in fax.zéqr~.¢f {E39 petii§_{}né:f"ag§{jpger' Anfiexure-B. It is aise

evide11'Vr;..  fr-.::m . AV11<ia.7;i:r$§I'}T.TA.ii1at "the 2'" féfipélléiéllt-COi1H}1iftt3B
appears t~;;¥V"l1;:M1':':~:V pé.%séd.av1f§solution on 92.08.2008 reseiving to

forfeit  sitesnfii-s3It§_§iA to the applicants in the aforesaid market

»  A_c0p3:_6fihe resolution was forwarded to the 1*' respondent

H aséxpésr on 22.89.2008. After the resolution dated

G2.(§8.2G@8, ‘fili~e 2″ reap-:’;:1d<-3111; has Ilntimated filfi petitioner that the:-.

» $1133 qtzestion has been forfeited as gar z–'-.nne:~:£zre~{Z", In the notice
3: Arme:i:"ure~C, reference has been made £9 a sizzzw cause smtice

said to Exave beeri issued by the I" respsancienzt to the petitioner

callirzg ripen him is Shaw cause as ta 'J§€§"13»' the gite in qneatien

shsuld not be forfeiteé. Admittedlgg the site was allotieé is the

§
': 2

\}~;;