Teekhajee Rao vs Shukar Sab on 2 April, 2009

 

IN THE 3193 COURT 0F KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED TEES THE 2ND DAY 0? APRIL 2ao3._
BEFORE _ T_  A
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.s.BQ§AN§5; f+ '

BSA No 2322 0? 2003_m_ r

BETWEEN

TEEKHAJEE RAG.

S/O L&TE RAMOJI RAD,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
RESIDING AT .

KALAI BEEDI,
MULBAGAL -- 563132

_-H ; z_a_' }.ffig§P5LLANTcs>

(By Sri. K.vE5KA:g sUfi§£§R{ §bvdéA?Eé

SHUKAR sAB;«' ' n
sxo HASSAE SAB,'_ ._. »_'«~
SINCE DEAD'8¥"fi1S"LES;g&}

1. MOULASAB;u. 'w 'V
.*AGEB.$flQ§I 39 YEARS ..... ~-

. HiEEg§g;L1 % , ;
AGEQ'ABDUIW25'¥EARS

bx)

V= §['HAssE§aBEz;-«V

K A§EB BQUTa22 YEARS
:».?3?7""*.



II}

'" 5§ége3 Kélfir, aiiowing the appeal and seting aside-

 

.42,

KHADAR BEE.
AGEB ABGEET 22 YEARS

SANAULLA,
AGED ABQUT 19 YEARS

SHAHEENABEE
AGEB ABOUT 16 YEARS

BHAVANBEE,
AGEB ABOUT 14 YEARS
LBS 1, 2, 4 8; 5 ARE SQNS

AND LB NO.3 IS WIFE AND
LE 5 & 7 ARE MIGR
CHILDREE or LATE SHUKUR~,
SAB any THEY ARE ._f
REPRESENTEB BY THEIR
NATBEAL MOTHER LR.NO.3
AND ALL ARE HESIBERTS
0? KALAI REED! 'K. 
MULBAGAL -553' ;132.;:~ _.

LAKSEME BA1, <,"k,_

$10 LATE RAMG1;.RA&,' ,
AGED ABOUT_64 YEARS; *.'
RESIDING'$T:' ' '.*. =
KALAI BE£D;,'% .V .-
HULBAGAL ~ §§3132;_

RESPONDENT C S J

‘~és5*t£:ea ukéfibo sf CFC against the

. 9e§1’–f3e étd: 31.1.2068 passs.-d in RA.

‘*__’ fin zsizsei ég tae file ef the Add1«Sessimns Judge,

E a., §rcg::f Kciar cg: sf 1 $dd1.Dist & Sessiens

‘K “~?his BSA is aoming on far Orders, this day,

M3,-

the Court made the fo£1Qwing:

Two weekg to comply witfi2th§[dffEcé’
objections failing which the appéa; will §ignqV §
dismissed without further réfefence fu.£hé

Bench.

Ty.By : fi.§§N\j”f

C. By :°”-:1? . – ‘ ‘ !
Ty.Date. £{11{fl9._ , . ~_ .¢;*
C. Date: 3g§H€¢§ VV . V%i Ham