[I
In w.1='. No. esvvxjaosm
" Road. nijagur.
111
IN run nae COURI or xannamaxa Am naNaaLom5=
Damn» razs was oi" nu: or npnxn. 2oo§§f{= é
in-vnnuru -in
WX'firI&j'I
1 "'1~.e Asst. 2.1::--"' 'F971-'ye:-.".v_!.ri1i*V'-~=1.-;?':= A
-bl I-Illa-Q-V
E111; Pandhayath Rngina§king:" '
fiuh-fiiviniog;_3¢n'ikaman fioadg
Bijlpux. ; ',r * MW
2.. "'1'-..e =!.-:e.«ié4:t$;"; V':-i'-2~.:',;.!4.'..ee.=r.*,
3111!: Plnchflyqtt ,.f
%
V «-599 S4-:;:.g%p4I. !t.en:;.n.._i,-
. .vAq*ed"vqb:imt'32 years.
".fiaaidgfi$ aivcfa a.s.raei1,
Bertha]. 'agahi, Indi Road,
3i'j¢{3fiE
""§ V1LnSri;'§§Iu 8/0 amugi Loni,
" Ag"-'a=.'. abaat 55 3-a...-*5.
é' '-_M3:l.dnnt at nlnapuna {Rahal},
:Cio 5.3. l?o.til, i-carnival Mani,
. . .1L'IS?ONDEN'.l'8
£3! 53:. Hansen 5* In»: vi
'*1
'this writ Potition is filed undiz
.....A 60"!
fiifiielaa 226 am out at the Ca:-.:.-9.1.!-.1:.*.:i:~.:*.w~.ie.*«£*~..
India, praying to quash the impugned V.
dated 15.12.2603 puma by the __--'.E;aa:éi:nij&
Presiding Officoz. B-ijapur: in Ref. 1~{9."5.9i2i!01 ' T
'lfidl annexure 'A' . _
BETIBEN :
In 3.1'. R0. 85707006:
1. Thu ant. Eaocutiva Engingux;
iii in iancinyath V §x)gin.ai'ri._imj,"-» __
sub-Division, Bu1d_i??.amnn.V--aoag1, _
Bijqpur. "
2. The Exocut:1fi:r;§'--Bngfiii§§.§z*, V
2111:
31 japuz :'nm.,y1an, ii-r5..;£»ili"=1??=iti*.. i .. .PE'1'I'I'IONERB
{BY sum}. 3'!-i"""?-*._7"("_J'£'i-?'4VV"'fii.'_'a?.3fifiV'J'."1'.'ES, """'v'"""""'.i.'Efii
5:1 . lrzmir:
_.,5f:'a I-Eigjirisah ifiizfiawaat,
.V mad" *----ube"ut '39 yujéi.
':m"¢"Jnr:p.r.og:i,.__ Hour hchur Katti,
Sitlnfii 6:.-._ jvi-"--.9a:i_.. _ V Eij spur . . . . RESPONDIIHT
:3: am, 3. an-:.nz.n.99z~.u.=«. .9-
A' 'i*-'mic «:1: Petition in filed under
Tfixeiclea 226 and 227 of the Constitution of
--...'I:.~.1.1,ie.. gggying :9 quggh the zlmpugnod onward
"'»..¢in_tad 15.12.2005 panic!' by tho learned
*.Pfiii:':'Li.W fiffifiafip Bi-jag-:11: in Ref. 2:.-=.a2.4'2ee2
--« ~ Vida Annexuro 'A' .
' BE'1'I'I£N :
In VLF. ND. BGBGIZOOE:
1. The hunt. Exucutivo Engineer,
2111.: .'%a:~....*-*-.a3-at}. Br.-,-ir.ee.~:.i.-...,~,
Bub--D.i.1riaion. nnndikaman B;::'a;d.F., V
nijapur. 1 '
2. 'mo Exoc.-utivo Engimwz-,-.___
9.1 1 1 I Dun:-215.:-|r.n1':I1 . -
Bijapuz Diviuion;
3. 'me cage: Executive7"e:s.'i;;:;;-;'*--Tj~
21114: Panchnyath, _ V '
fiij spur fiiIi:_::ig=i:. ,fii'j--a'pur..._j.__ .;
um am-. -.§asm:Afs§%; AINDGATR3)
mm: %%%% -
31:1. Appa:ana.Ew..I§-,_A fippanm . . '_'
Shctty B'.oI{.=_, AgIid_fah*a31t:. 35' years}-
I'I;li!;l_!;l!Li. »*In;1uatricu,
Darya' Road. Rea: :1-I:L'11;
'A Ann. 413'
In-.lJ......;...§ ;u.....I..'. .....a. ..
. .Il.I.JI_§Mg.Lp mnxLJuEa5saf.§uugnap
C.!q"ari;"L».V;G. !tu1h;k.u:n1; , '_
".§sd1fe¢;Vatg;«.% B13 npuzr. . .
Jz1§é.!.'sI1i";*&»& 3. mman-pmuvAn,_;_ Arman-rm
"I"ri.i.$* imi: retition is i:'i1ic'1Hi1"nn.II"':'rE
,fi:ti<:1ea 226 and 227 of the Constitution of
7IEi_II_.,$' praying ta quash the iupuqnadj mud
-.f.c.!.;;e¢ ;t.§=f_lz=2t;It_3:'.s pgsgag by the learned
"'*V..E:_:e:siding ottican. Bijapur in Rat. Na.23.f20o1
"Vii-id: afiniiiizra 'ii' .
'muse writ D-atitians earning on to:
Enauminary Homing in 'B' .Gx:ou1_'.: this day, the
court made the £o11cm:i.ng:-
Kai
0 R D E 5
Those three writ potitions are V.
against Ref. Na. 23. 32 and 59 of 2koo'v.1.: a.... *
15.12.2005.
2. It dispute was raiai-§&--~.... by ~.1':iha, _ v%
inter-«lie alleging ;__tha1:_. as
flail? '---= wlwees *.é7.*'~.::'si".~'-.5] gs-;_g,'-u;|.L'£I;5 Lye
boen tanninatggi. illisiari
that they ~ é1io days at
continupup 25-3 of the
1.1). -'to rotrenclmant and
g;._n_.1m-ad issg_1ngt's-.t&Vijua::Lit..».. 9w1t:h but wages and
Claimant in Rat. No..'.'u9f2OD1 also
. that, ho had conwletud 240 day: or
faontinuoua service and claimant in Rat.
No.32!2001 also worked 240 days cf continuous
51!.'
'[
auzvice. In support of their cum. they
roliad on Vouchers i::¢.I«I1 to M9, N10 to
Ex..n1 to H21 in Ref. No.32.
4. The Labour court has-viva}.
doaumunta round that, '1E_1_ja.po c21V:n1,raar;:£éi._*~...11g:§3o %
waged :9; 240 ginnytj of c9n£ivfiuaysiQ" (your
"ad th-'3; are 1*...-s'.:"'-- 5§ais'.'- i.'-:.'l.""££{" . '+~J-.'~..et:e:'-....*'-"'.-13::-.*.:
courmnnntion. anti' 'TT§:-.i:'e._'j.__' .V:ar§i:"ii;1e for
rains tatarag-3:.
putitiofiefis %V izhnt. in so far as
claimant fi<$'.;.1._'1:;-né':;""izo.59r2oo1 is conaonnad.
5 haé :.not': ._ceufi§1i'e§d 240 days of continuum
'icLr;:Et'.."' - to H9 t:1w_.r do not prove
this nmn;-an .sm_: 1 :11 Sill;
u A provisions, all the employment: are roquir.-ad
to he made in accordance with than Rules or
~ :Lu
1:o<:1:u:I.tment. He further aubzrnittod that. thciisg
worhuon were engaged temporarily
' " ..
particular purpose and for short M
H
9- 21;;
it th-
right created. in the
alas suhm:l.t1:a-:1 than': d§§:i.V:VL"y"3Iv-iragos
for 1:£emp orury porigé : 39 articular
purpose cann-;§t':§;a;; é* ccé:§:1a?§L§ééiotf.A':§»:fiLé§"~Va;.___jé§i'§'ht created
n-urngg;
----
1D
1|’!
Ir!
I1′!
49
I1
“I5
(I
I3
: :3
31′
1:!’
1%
I?-‘
1
I
l
J.
E
It
3.1!
1′!’
H
H’
auhtuittfisf in which they are
working ark’ x; ot.V’;a§na{:’i Vow:nd post and the 3.1.11:
gunfi6fi””‘éontinua the petitioners in
It is turthu: auhrnittod that,
…1’: $33.35 x
but tho cmnpannation could be an-mrand
against the noinatutomont and whon the post
not in oxiatenco or post is tonuponary in
nutura or the past: is for I paxtziculax pugpoao,
1; gm
,9»;
I;-V”-
_ directing
-1
the reinstatement amounts
etaating a post 10.1: the purpoaa._’ ‘_;V.i’§§;:fiA~
reinstatement. ‘rho vouchers p»roduca__d ‘ T’ 1 ‘V
pe°.:it.’ic-.:-.2.-…-5 =.-n.3,’ shag t….-9…,-3′ th-‘tr 7-.9.-.i;v.’~L».__”
daily wages for paziicuiaa
point: of time the appoiniili-grit’ N4.
rogulax appoint::wont}_”~V-._ the
Laaznad Counaej, rolifisvia’ of the
Apax court the matter
Irla _
an . .7 .. ..
iii su:g.i:e.a-mt, the inifzial
burden af fiho workman had worked
2-GO dgayrau “is on the workman. Evan
rgonfiiifibaa working of 240 days. if
is izmvporaxvy, the workman will
” v,_;S5’ho further: zaiiati on a judgm” out M’:
x Icoum: in 11.: 200′: III. also in the matter
VaLk% :q£ na:n ulnnn nan:-an no ‘VII
.. In
circutuntutcu has held that, it than
appointments are short lived and
tmmpczary for a particular scheme,
gaze: gig g 4 in; 1:43;: -:a.1.’f’1::i. 33..
in ‘fihii aaia fi””w.’|.i”a” V
that. in one of totmdgfifiry cit
contractual employmagit to:
particular pus;-nu, _…;,,:,’v.:’;:f§.ji_.¥”__¢’-,4or1:EaJ: any
right in tho tr.» –:}é1ai:i’1*'{–]’ra’i§§§’ta1:amant.
7. shy. :’.§’a i;;::V?5:her decision of
the npéx cou§h£’Vizcsij:o:i:§ai1n (toot) 5 Ice 1:’! in
tho matta:’iM%a:V cm! unxctnr.
-‘—5-i””=’e=”: V.’ .V%.’.-.’.-= e..– I..-..-.-. an era.-.-.3 and
W_g11i:miVtt_§&_ in can an appointment made
basis and riot in town of
V .pno§i”aié§s”‘$£ any 1111.0: remand thor.-«under, had
tight to continue in urvice.
tho appoint:-aunts _having been made all
in
CI.
fll
I-
H
1
£
H
II
‘In
‘ sonic: cannot be construed to he roizuanczimont
under the provisions or the net. In this
daily wage
Q2’! t-“.1A.ec 21*-n:|.te th t
” nature and the uorimifi iiith
‘ had accepted the daily wage eraployment.
sequel.’ she relied can at para: 13 of the said
judgment.
She eleo relied on
judgment reported in (8006! I see T’ K
abolition of project or “”a.:V:”techeuie_V_
itself. workmen .’ “d;Lrected’VV to:
nine teteruent . V
6. Learned ..;I_.’or Pfititionere
relied _c:1r1..__e “?+Irar’_viI’:1§’:’e’«-,:J__. the Apex Court
as welig nan’ eubtuit that when e.
‘ 1}’-
ll
4-._.i.1}r _ 3.1.-:_:’I_r;I_.n:l__e;u.:..1_ to: I.
.1—
II-U
yuayunv 13
Flu
HI
fl’
employee cannot
of right: for reinstatement.
It .. tea: a particular scheme and for
‘2;gsarti..¢;uiex pun:-pane the appointments are made.
cIII¥1u –u–u uni I
also euhmitted that, no doubt in normal
” ” V . Vioapofzd” xiii .
circumstances, if the worhuan conducts
days continuous somrico, if ha is
tunninated from service, the
I:
3
[J
In.
I!’
ll
dz
:4
r
1:?
-< nu
I.=~
I5'
1::
Fr
E-
as
it-*
-r
IP-
1:
against the ”
rninatatomcnt has to he itiiifiecfi Vizmé
at rodruitmfim; ho
continued for ions: pogt
dohoru to 14 and
1!’. of t..-.: £.::~.:-.+e-;~.:,-a.i.—;:*».;:1,.é.~sz~;i:«.ai£;::~.-:-11;;
9. ’12t;:’1.._AiIe’aifia’j:-.,§ubEfii.§’to’d-‘ that, in this can
1.211; sngn_g§z:,_gg1:.f; particular period and
cwn§’e:__to an end. I-linwavar.-, the izabnuaz
.. the ground that, ratzunctmont
: is not granted tn the
if ‘4″1.;:§i:rpa;-adiiinta, has allowed the uclaim petition
roiizatatamant oi! the roupondanta would amaunt
to creating a post without cadre strength and
01! than 1.1:. not.
-311a
also amounts to hoping the surplus orrploamfim;
in the 2111: Banal-myath, to: which
sanction. She also nuhmtted t:hjI§;’v:”_’ T’
The Labour Court without iefisrrinq’ fiat:
hlfi
wound that, the completed
240 days o£;””£E;pg§;tir}.11os1é.”‘: zuntnu
hum
.. 239:: paid
1.-nt:§:ia1jz’¢:!niIIr11Vj锑Véefiwéhfiatiun, the tupondenta
are ar_:1:_1t1§ d £6: ‘I~zd’:3.:iii:atomont.
__caun.-.Ia1 appearing tor: tho
.t’fi§§£#nd’i;fi’I$?iébL£kfll0n submit: that; tho
«gtocuaiiii-:.11:$ . faroducad boron the Labour court
Ehnt all those respondents have washed
once the workman oatahliahau
that he had wound 2430 days aontinuoualy in I.
uuama the c1.§1m tn’;
rafi:-ificmun*’f5fvnf1″§V:fiafi’tpiaiati’6n failure i:oA
you: his termination is illegal, and $5129
Norman in ontitlud tor rainutatonIi!fl:_”4:
consequential benefits. He fuzrtharh’ u
that. thl Labour: Court
” . 2 4%.’
firms °i:.’::ie..’i..I: on
daily mngoa 210 days
continuouly in I. being no
zotranclnnont section
25-! of fl’-i_1i;i_= ____
roinni:ai:’ea:fieni:.– ..–~cormaction, he relied
on a 2-VIV;’:a¢:uAAr’!’itie:?§nV in 200! 11!. our 306 in
:_’j’ “E:L).’ nun nmmnnrzou s
ta-n., VII. nnnr.
dfilifiéii in question and the Qupromo court ha
i. -«. §:aii£imnd thy name.
7′
11. 575 iii?) a11’zic1’uit”1:id ‘fi”‘f, ifi one aria ‘in
Norman has been rainstntnd in pursuance at
I I-135″ u
3131:
the award. However. the I-earned Counsel ‘fax
the petitioner submitted that,
xeinautement man in compliance T’ ‘V
interim order passed in the vhfiit’peL;i.1;i.,;;;–_._ “V” I
12. The only q11eation” _th..at
consideration in th:i.__a : ‘
“whether the reupefifiehfé a:éevAA.’jefitit1ed to:
xeinateteraentv up ‘_-..1_:Vr.iat;«, V they have
camnpleted 2 ~§£__1r:.pn1;–ig;zie1§I§e” ‘aerviee in 1
your in reepee_;i:;»’;V9f” ‘eIu§§’§;ej,fment under the
fll-Ab H’ ”
13. !mg16:;re1envt'”‘ state is; _ a ‘public
:5
if
I
E:
J
1:.
‘.4’
*2
5:-
[.-0
{ul-
(1
Q!
-ii
2;’
“i
ll
HI
,I
II
fl’
.i|’u:’ti¢:1-D 365 of the fionstitution
Rule or Prmriuiona made in
Lrtiéle are subject to Part III at the
‘V’.’e §’2eens:.;tfib1on particularly articles 14 and 16
constitution at India.
It. in not in dispute mat, the petitioner
is Z2111: Panchnyeth and state w:l.t;hJ.n- the
2%
\_.
c”-w
-1’…
meaning at Article 12 of the constitution.
in nine not in dispute that: the
were engaged on daily wages and ‘ 1 ‘V
Ann-I new emu ngnatinnnd n;-nut 2
iwxww W ———— –1vV–r ‘- v — ‘V:
recruitment firfifiiiiu nit V
dispute that, the efitg:’&gement_V_ Htlie
respondents in ‘ion the
qualification nor but it
was to: exigentfigg’ tinein’:.w~’:ee:1nfii1dae_fwene engaged-
.f.e: a gaxtitninn If es-..I.pJ.e:,-2′.-..-.2-.t is
given ‘viéfiei -:5: teiifgierary ‘pinion taut
employment not confer: any night
on the ‘tn dleiin for reinstatement. No
undue; s.¢mn 25*!’ of the LD. Act. if
‘is. nemgietea continuous service or one
:-(ta:-,i.e~.~ -. aw.
ZLEF-‘G -‘–~’- in – }’$..’…’.’; – is entitled.
benefit :51′: fiection 25:-F. hU’If”‘i.f; ir*v”i–”
iienfilejgment in the state has to be in
“‘«’.’:qe:ieenence with the Rules or regulation made
Hinder Article 309 or the constitution. It in
not the case of the respondents that. they ,
J
L 7
were appointed against a permanent poa1: b::
against: a clan: vacancy on to the V.
post. if for oxiqoncy, the 2111; * K
.25′
confer: any right in the
to: z-ogulaxisntion i:; 1′:ho'” poat
or * 0113″ toinatntmont ” Emchwnth
can continue; iinily wagon
y.r1n_i..t.=h its Evan in
“”” H N M past: Is: lame:
po:1od.vvv”w1f;ich ‘to filled by regular
:oaxu.iJ:mn£”” Rules, it amounts to
thy .v.”«Ha’1V:ViiL;’L’b..-; zucruitmont and amount:
Articles 14 and 16 oi.’ than
‘”~I’11 7ch.1a cure. it in not sham: by the
gaagta are sanctioned
O-‘In –
unw-
JILIII
VJ: –
H schema grill in oatiatanco nor the war’: in
available. Hanover. the avidonca is clean:
1_:_,g garrison at I
I” .
. ( V
‘that the engagement wee for 3 were week;
-several breeze. it was not aantinuoue, 2
shown” that. the reepondente were ‘ 1 H
their eenricee wax-9″ “”zV:e¢.ti”.rec5L«
–e– an’. -an nunfin
en’.IM1″l _ 1-: -p…._
l.’n:.J.J.n. relnwueuruus. 5
I
by the petitioners, cieerife. ehauie
respondents were sgxgeageeig n-§:;VV:’itj,nuei1ci13’f.v4 but
.t:he:e were eevezel exigency
the engegemnt”««T:.§;’a Vnot center
to claim
“1355, ceae. .wihe£e~ ;ifjV~.i:he”=.ermegemen’c are mean’ in
reepagtv oi}. _:pe§.t is not sanctioned and
is V”Vm””Vpu:poee or: work exists:
employee would amounts to
this case, from the records it appears
. temporezy puzpoee the eezvicee of the
» ufreepomdante were engaged. and 11′ the nature at
engagement in team-e::e.x:y end if that purpose is
4’6n1y’:e~–§ueati9n
~ Thais? that
rhe”:::.ofi;11ded. The said judgment
e Tnut,
-31?-
over._ no right would flow from the unis;
employment. The decision relied on
learned counsel for the zeupondente, 1
Q-I__rgg;
:41… -..——–…’ 1.4.:-n4.:nLfi
-=
case where the apex G0u::§J4::i1«a-.5 ‘HiV:i’1Ve
question ot aonti’§au_1ng”””‘”V. ‘rages
emleyee in respect the
State, has cfiéetion an to
A 1 AV £1
eruploymenfi %V circumstances are
entirely di’f!I_e:=ei1tA’ah£i’ is not epplieahlm The
w-ee considered by the Apex
“‘§S: fi:o whether the delay itself is
L.-
tn –. _xaai-:d ” 36 the
in case of delay the
has no hearing
the facts and circumstances of the case.
this court and the Apex court
¢.=r.=ae_i.’I_I1.= nt:_3_r
five taken 5 Vi!!! that, adherence
V
,Q,q»E’–
?W”v r
Q1’C
to the constitutional proviaidns in parmofint
consideration in the public
View of the facts and c1JlI€3l1ll|Bt3011C:Q’p’_M;fif ‘
direction of xeinatatouiizfiii» _1n8’1z§§i -ihfgi iého
Labour court in ‘rho
unapondontn hgvc day: of
continuous sg~t$*§éo; :1 :EiiSd”‘5;f’*:.’iva….;éoauanah1o to
«.:”~I;aataad of reinstatement, the
:§iia§’¢:1d§:{i:’§.. entitled for cuupunumzion ofi
–1ls.56″,t..)t*iv!:JV.a’?–“‘V’aa:ch.
sd/4
-, ‘judge
“= aw”