Loading...

The Authorised Officer/ vs Fayaz Khan S/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010

Karnataka High Court
The Authorised Officer/ vs Fayaz Khan S/O Burhah Khan, on 1 February, 2010
Author: Anand Byrareddy
 

m THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT 

DATED ms THE 157 my 05* FEBRUAR2%é01k:3{f% "::.  

BEFORE   

THE HOIPBLE MR. JUs*rIc:2: 

 A   

TI-IE AUTHORISED OFF'ICERl      
DEPUTY CONSERVATOR or-' cmsfifs %    & 
BANGALORE URBAN nrv:atQn,%.«%%kJ% %  
ARANYA BHA\IA.H._I§rIALLE 
BANGALORE..3...'  %      PETITIONER

[BY   ADVOCATE)
D:  ' .   3

1 FAYAZ 3/Vo BURHAH KHAN
AGED AI3QUT"41"YEARS,
.r;:/OM; s  NAWAX HANDICRFFS
  31.0.15, LWIC KALANGERE 'I'A'I'TEKERE
' - % RQAIJ,£;H.ANHAPATNA, BANGALORE DISTRICT.

   

Ans] O.-LATE DASTAGIRI KHAH
I'I{'3."15, 3RD CROSS,
 X TKASTHURBANAGAR
"MYSORE ROAD,

  «BANGALORE 25. ...RESPONDEN'l"S

 f :5? srvrr. BUDRUNNISA, ADV. FOR R1)

TI-HS WRIT PETI'I'ION I8 FILED UNDER' ARTICLE

226 83 22'?' OF COHS'I'I'IUTION OF INDIA PRAYING 'IO

QUASI-I THE ORDER PASSED BY THE FAST TRACK
COURT~II, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT,

8

 IJf5II..I \l\.lInIIL(A|uLn-u u. .u--- -- -



KKRNAIAKA 

...... ..v..m. vr n.H.luVHIHl\.H HIUI1 LUUKT OF KARNATAKA HiGH COURT OF-

BANGALORE DT. 16.2.2006 VIDE ANNEXURE
ALLOWING THIS WRIT' PETITION.    

THIS WRIT PETI'I'ION IS COMING ON   
HEARING THIS DAY. THE CQURT   "V

FOLLOWING:

O R D E«._R

--.___....._...--a......----...,...

Hard the     A-1;  the
petitioner and Lem-ma   No. 1.

2. The   may the following

  the police,
Forest the premises belonging to

the semncl   found 27 gunny bags of

 V"  déd   ' 1800 Kgm, stored in

 a stake!' licence in terms of Section

:  87 o£   Forest Act, 1963 (here1na.fi:er'
' " :as the 'Act' for brevity). approximatnly valued
   'Ihm-aafiaer, a case was  in
  No.3412oo3 under me Provisisom of the Act and
 criminal case was registerud in C.C.Ho.19966/2003,

which is pending consideration. It is the case of the
 State that the sandalwood chips seized by the

$

 

iHl'|t'|"| LIAII I



 

authorities wore produced bcfore the 

Ofiicerl Deputy Conservator of Forests,  
Div'mion. for further action was    'A V'
of the Act and Rules mede  
aajd aandalwood chips   A %

respondent within   first

respondent had _azi before the
Autlmrised of the seized
material. of 3210
1:33. only about 1800
lugs. had filed a writ

petition be£eeemie~:eeu1iew.1=. No.39405/2003 with e

to his application before the
petition was disposed of with a

his application within a month.
omocr after having issued eeriee of

% e the am respondent had rejected the
fflod by the first respondent since he had
V to produce any material in support ofhin claim fiat
seeking interim cuatody and had pass-ad an order of

oonfiacation of tin 27 bags of sandalwood white chips.

é

-In l’f’\.l’\’\ luau”. .—— –

q ….-… \.n’F nun-u’¢HIHt\A mun COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH comer or= {(A1-ZNATAKA Hrs:-H”

Awiaaveci by this, first respondent has

confiacatbn order before the Fast
Bangalore, to set-aside the ordcr gf ” 2
Fast Irack Court havmg’

petitioner is before this Cour 1:’,

3.The Gowrnmenmdmcg:%t§§A
e.~ntcrta1mng’ ‘ jmisdicfion to
pass the out that Fast
rm mm mm: in
in the premises of the

accond. “by itself is an ofi”cnc¢ under

ani therefore, the Clllesticns

by tho: firat respondent as to thy:

‘ ” and the firat rcapondcnt not being made
the proceedings was outside the scope
fj% proceedings. Violation of Soction 37 of the Act

apparent on the face ofthe record, there was no

warrant for the Fast Track Court to interfere with the

conficatinn order passed by the Authorised Ofiicer and

6

l3’r'(\”\ Ll£\lIJ Ll’\.lI.JtI_:s kt’.

2-

3
4
2

ti:

_;5
.0.

0

I-

x
D
O
U
I
‘:2
I
S
‘-E
Z
In
5
u.

0

I–

at
D
O
U
I
2
I
S
S
1
Z
1:

5

I.

3

I
J
J
1

until

therefore, seeks interference by this Court to

ixnpugned order passed by the Fast ‘I’racI§–

appeal.

4. While, the counsel Tfpr

seek to justify the order the”
he haa also produea::;1..A_ « madc
available no the Fast of the
appeal. It is f;ru$;§:1l’ bad in fact
purchased ¢;*iJg%a%VJ%naa1w& – and the second
A by the first

a pc-4jn::.itA fimaued by the concerned

carriage of the purchased

chqrmmm. The sarne having been carried
and having been stored in the
h according to the first respondent was
% _ withiout his knowledge. The fact remains that
was prurcluned in accordance with law and

was sought to be transported from the Government

Depotunden-avalfizlpernfit. Thezsamehavingbeen

2

Linn” I-IfiII.I IIl’\.IInlll.lh|\.II.n-no was —

W mmwamm :u«W§~:z mam W K&fiMm”‘fia%& Wm %::mm-*” W ‘§a§zm’mm Mm

mataféai 3?: Em gramfim bayané {ha §%§.§’§?;

mmfiitfifiiia fiiéé ‘Eh: firzfizg aaf fifza azzgkzgritiagi “i::~ }g:ié;¥,:: ‘V

Eiwre wag §m?fig& sf

$3? &§§§:{§1’§§ Smiifgn 3?’ af fii§&’5′—-§»:?E:

as: agwrtuzzig? ?a%¥§ry_§::;r_ 5af tim
ma?g:*f;a§ aria; iii: firfié z**e2$§§::::§a:f::1;: émawars af fix:
‘<;ig§fiim§§ which ha fwmzfié; k §..eg;i*a:3s%.;;¢ygsL,-anasa in am

gm §:§%:$;§:s,::;§:=. 2 ' "

Eiéfimg ‘~ g§%§é;a& mafia ms: far

m*&:x ‘Em writ yatifuign

Sd/’4
EEEDQE

3 ar2g%§fi% ig at mg a vimiafifigz fig gags _

mmmmmmm w

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies. More Information