High Court Karnataka High Court

The Badami Sugars Ltd. vs The Managing Director on 16 November, 2009

Karnataka High Court
The Badami Sugars Ltd. vs The Managing Director on 16 November, 2009
Author: H.Billappa
1_ c
. Jr.'

DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE H.BILLAi§PA:ACt.: 2 

W.P. No.66195/EOUQMICS-DIAS};«E1' V

Between:

1

 57_yr';=.,

The Badami Sugars Ltd' 
Ramadurga Road, Badaini' _
Rcptci. By its Managing"D.i'fcct0r
Balappa Chimmémak7attj.. .  * 

Ba.'12i1jp.a 1Cvii:iVrI1En3:a-nVéi}<at't_i   '
S/QV.Bh_i1?:1appa  ._ E M '

occf 'CEi;..air1"£3a1: .&;~Managing Director

 Baclami' 'Siigaf   E'

 / 0 %cha.1u1<yVa riagéir 

Badami, Baga1kout.'CDistrict. .. PETITIONERS

  S M nCi1a,r;_qta.3hekar, Adv)
' :'»Ex_,N1:7.':-. 

  Ivédfiaging Director
Batg-;.a1kot District Central

 CO'--"0p. Bank Ltd
" _ Pradhana Kachcri

'"BasawCshwara Circle

Bagaékot



2 The Asst.Registrar
Co--op. Societies and
Recovery Officer, 11/12 441
The Bagaikot DCC Bank Ltd

Bagalkot ..    

(By Sri Dinesh M f0i*._R~:1 V' _  H '
Smt K Vidyavathi, A.,GA;'for'R-2}_   V _ 

This WP is filed unde1=.o:.}3i--:fticle.s'*~226.8; "of the V

Constitution of India, praying to-_isst.,1e a ix/1'«--i.t_ of prohibition
against the respondent authorities "'exercising the power

under the_ Karnataka Co’-op;eratii.re”Societies Act, which are
the result of initiation” o-f,.i”recoV’e1fy. proceedings by
exercising the power u.t1de.r S_ec.tio’n’v.70~. of ” the Karnataka
Co–operative Societies Act and_etc’.–,_._ ‘ ” ‘

‘i’his”WE? for preliminary hearing this day,

the Court tn the” fol_lo*is)_in_g:’–‘i’

-i’;J?:tD E R

in this writ ipetitiointiinder Articles 226 81, 227 of the

Clzitiassiitt.11ion._of’india; the petitioners have sought for writ

‘ oi. tJ1’i}’i1ib’i¥;i()§1 andmialso called in question, the auction

n.o13:ii”ic::i.§ic>ni dated 7-1 1-2009 i.e., Annexure–A.

auction notification dated 7-11-2009 is

iss u&;*-ti pLiI’SL18.1’1i’. to the award passed in

DDS,/67/2008-09 which has been challenged

i§’:3e{o1′-e the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal in appeal