IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3:4 my 09 AUGUST: " _ PRESENTHW THE HONBLE MRJUSTICE MORAN :sHgs;1st*;1g.t§2;gc3:::UVvAfé I
.5″-D _ . .
THE HONBLE MRS. Jusrfba B.v.NAGA?;;aT1?mA”‘
wnrr r;ppEA1gNo.’3;~é*:*;%%2oo2%
BETWEEN: % A
THE BANGALQRE W:frR0PoLITAr:VV–
TRANSPORTACC3-RPOVRATION ~
cENTRAL’.0PF1CE’S;_BAN’cAL0RB; 560 027
BY ITS MANAGiNG*Dj1’RECf£GR~”
REP. BY FPS CHIEF mw- oFF1cER.. .. APPELLANT’
(mi jszei L. .L.Gév1:q 1j:;RA.j, ADV. ABSENT}
I KSR?frE.,SI$é;FF AND WORKERS
. ‘P’EDRA’–If§–0}.*I REG. No.4/75
-,(AmL1Ah1f–E£> TC} Amie)
M025, 4’13 moss,
sAm>I;GE ROAD, MALLESHWARAM
‘A . BA;~:GALoRE 560 0:23,
_ {TS GENERAL SECRETARY
SR1. I~i.V.ANAN’I’HASUBBA RAG.
V. STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
TO GOVERNMENT,
– 2 –
TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT
VIDHANA SOUEHA, BANGALORE 560 001 . RESPO_ND_E–NT$
(SR1 MCDNARASIMHAN, ADV. FOR R1.
SR1. R.K.HAT’I’I,, HCGP FOR R2)
THIS WRKT APPEAL 18 MLED,-‘U’]s«:r .0137, ‘rufi;j”1§;.«xRi§ATA1§:A
HIGH comm’ ACT PRAYING TO SETASIDE A’PHE»GRDERVVPA_SS:I§’.D
IN THE WRIT PETITION r4o.359?e/199.3 DATED WV/as/2oo;2~..
Tms APPEAL coM1NG’T_dra.. FOR” HEA’Ri§qG;i._”‘m:s: DAY-
MOHAN SHANTANAGOUDAR J., DE§}{VERED.THAE– FOL§.OWING:–
…………_
This matter is Though the
matter is agijk5¥;1§I1ed:3«.seivc3i’ai”‘ tV§13z:i¢3s,…f1;h<»: matter is not
_ 'itiis clear that the appellant is not
to g§'6n'*With the matter. Hence, the appeal
__ far non-prosecution.
sa/-.
JUDGE
8%/r’/V133
JUDGE
kmv
