High Court Patna High Court - Orders

The Bihar State Co-Opt.Mkt.Uni vs Brajendra Kumar Dubey on 24 September, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
The Bihar State Co-Opt.Mkt.Uni vs Brajendra Kumar Dubey on 24 September, 2010
                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  LPA No.1272 of 2004
                   1.      Bihar State Cooperative Marketing Union Limited,
                          through its Chairman Biscomaun Bhawan, West
                          Gandhi Maidan, Patna.
                   2.     Managing Directror, Bihar State Cooperative
                          Marketing Union Limited, through its Chairman
                          Biscomaun Bhawan, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna.
                   3.      The Financial Controller, Bihar State Cooperative
                          Marketing Union Limited, through its Chairman
                          Biscomaun Bhawan, West Gandhi Maidan, Patna
                                         .---- Respodnents--Appellants.
                                                 Versus
                    (1)   A. Geeta Devi wife of Late Brajendra Kumar Dubey
                    (2)   B. Sanjay Kumar Dubey
                    (3)   C. Kumar Ajay , both sons of Brajendra Kumar Dubey
                   (4)    D. Chandra Kumari daughter of Brajendra Kumar
                            Dubey, all residents of village Deokuli, P.S. Brahpur,
                            District Buxar. ---- Petitioners/ Respondents.
                                                    -----------

9/ 24-09-2010 Heard Mr. Rajesh Prasad Chaudhary, for the

appellants. None appears on behalf of the respondents.

This appeal under clause 10 of the Letters Patent of

the High Court of Judicature at Patna has been preferred by the

respondents of C.W.J.C. No.6214 of 2004, who are aggrieved by

the order dated 19.05.2004, whereby direction has been given to

the appellants herein to make payment of the post retirement

dues to the writ petitioner. Learned counsel for the appellants

submits that the entire post retirement dues of the writ

petitioner have been paid, which renders this appeal

infructuous.

In that view of the matter, this appeal is disposed of

as having become infructuous.

( S. K. Katriar, J.)

( Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)
BTiwary/