High Court Kerala High Court

The Chairman vs The Regional Transport Officer on 13 October, 2009

Kerala High Court
The Chairman vs The Regional Transport Officer on 13 October, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 27980 of 2009(N)


1. THE CHAIRMAN, PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.MOHAN PULIKKAL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :13/10/2009

 O R D E R
                             S.SIRI JAGAN, J.

                      ==================

                       W.P(C).No.27980 of 2009

                      ==================

                Dated this the 13th day of October, 2009

                             J U D G M E N T

The petitioner claims to be the chairman of the Parent Teachers

Association (PTA) of the Kendriya Vidyalaya, Puranattukara, Thrissur.

According to the petitioner, the PTA represented by him has

undertaken the task of transporting students and teachers of the

school to and from the school. The school is said to be situated in a

remote place with very little public transport facilities. Therefore,

1400-odd school children are depending solely on the buses operated

by the PTA numbering 15. In view of the overcrowding in these buses,

the PTA is stated to have purchased a new bus. He submitted an

application for transfer of registration of the said vehicle under Section

50(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act. Ext.P3 is the application submitted by

the petitioner. The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to

consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application expeditiously.

According to the petitioner, under Section 50(6) of the Act, the

respondent is bound to effect transfer of ownership on receipt of the

application in form No.30, which has been done by the petitioner.

2. The learned Government Pleader, on instructions, submits

that there is a serious dispute as to whether the PTA represented by

the petitioner is the real PTA and there is a rival PTA also. According

2

to the learned Government Pleader, the principal of the school

reported to the respondent that the association represented by the

petitioner is not the real parent teacher association.

3. Having heard both sides, I am of opinion that on receipt of

an application for transfer of registration, the respondent is bound to

pass orders either way and he cannot sit on it indefinitely. In the

above circumstances, the respondent is directed to consider and pass

orders on Ext.P3 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one

month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment,

after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and a

representative of the principal of the school.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

sdk+                                              S.SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

         ///True copy///




                               P.A. to Judge