High Court Karnataka High Court

The Chief Law Officer vs Smt Nagarathnamma on 21 July, 2010

Karnataka High Court
The Chief Law Officer vs Smt Nagarathnamma on 21 July, 2010
Author: Ram Mohan Reddy


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.

DATED THIS THE 21st pg? 01+’. 2610 _! ” E’ ~

BEFORE .. 3 4′

THE I-ION’BLE MR.JU1S_T–1(3E g§:D15Y–f *

MISC.W N0 .’é*1’9oE E015 2010: _
IN WRIT PETITION. No;’1″7E3.t3I””Q_F 2010 (L-KSRTC)

BETWEEN

THE
KARNATAKA _~-STA”1i’.iE »Rc;;A13. j’F?AN_SPORT

coRp’O’RATI:QI\f:’CEN=T:é§A1, “I’SION K H ROAD.
sHANm1NA@A.R.”«BANGALORE

‘ ‘ ‘ PE3’1’I’1’IOi\J¥_+ZR
[By S1-i SAi’JJEZEV’..:ADV )

V V :1′ E. NVAGARATHNAMMA

“”A.’v;;~.E:3,”;*’0 YEARS
W/C? LATE G-ANGAPPA
=.fNG.’Z16, L K R NAGAR.

~ V I; G HALLI, RMV 11 STAGE.

“BANGALORETQ4

THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER
PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT

DIVISIONJL KARMIKA BHAVANA
BANNERG HATTA ROAD’

BANGALORE

:3 THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER AI\II:’z.._
APPELLATE AU’l’HOR1TY ” ‘ ~_
UN DEER THE PAYMENT OF’ GRATUITY ._ ,_
BANGALORE REGIONWQ ‘– .. ‘
KARMIKA BHAVANA.

BANNERGHATTA ROAD. ._
BANGALORE I

{By Sri : LAKSHMAN RAO;’TABy FOR C/RI
[BY SRI. JAGADISH MUNDARQ’I”.. AGA ‘I*fO_RA &,R3)

MISC. w FILED U.§\JbE3f§_; S”BCTION””‘I’5I OF CPO
PR/WING TO VACATE’. I%.I\E”§’E’RII’./1′()RI)E3R PASSED BY
THIS HONBLE COURT OR 2’v-I’.’B;2Q.I_G..

TI~IIS_.IvI-ISC.w :COI\/II’I’sIO4,OI\IIj’v~I«iORVj’ORDERS. THIS DAY.
THE COURT Ix/IAI>__.I~; rm?’ ;.E’OLLOWIN(3’i’

“>ymWa0RDER
‘I”h§-_= (fivffv{V5’i’_€’.”1’V”1′.€’.T(*’.’ O’f}g4rat.IIiI.y awarded by the Gratuity

C{1}:fl11TEiSSi()I§E:’f.__E1I1d as affirnled by the Appeilate

A _ 1″*\..1,,ViJE,1′-1V{)’I”~iT”_}T,_iE’3_(78fl@d in quCS1;iOII in this writ. pet.i1:iOrI_. In

Viriéw the matter. hearing the appiication to

veIL:at7e… fh€ Interim Order requi1’eS the hearing of the

: f) €Iyi'[4iO}’i. Hence the application is rejected.

£33).

9…?

$3 f..,,
B4,!
3