The Commissioner Of Income-Tax vs Allied Founders Pvt Ltd on 3 February, 2009

Between:

1

 L Arm"~----

IN rm men comrr or xarummxa  

CHKXWTBEMGKATDHRRWAD

Dated 3*' day of February  V   

Present   

Hoafble uwustice   %  7 *  T T 7

And-..__ A %
Hezfble Mr.Justlce  

 

1.T.a. 1§e .2   

THE COMMISSIOK';ER_.QF - ' %
1r4coME%s*Axw_. _   
LENGADE;=;1;~:-:;.'::)1m~._,  _ 1 
cum R.QP;D;f, ' J  H 

B:§i1§<§A%Ur.§».V§.59fl§9}3vb=c1: '~{ _

'mI:« Assismfifif iisfimsssronma or
INCOMETAX' %  % . 
CIRCLEJ  

, _:;.ENGA:3E"B1.3;LD1AN
 V-i_c:L§JB ROAD  """ "
« . ., 1r3§;LG.ALIaa-596 001

."APPELLANTS

" _(E33?S£_i .M;§f;$ESHACHALA~--ADV)

T A'LL1 Ei3 .F0iINDARIES PVT. LTD.
- _ N»o,3,"U'DYAMBAG
 BE_LC~A'UM

."RESPONDENT

(BY Sri K.R.PRASAD~A{)V)

-000-

\~w/

”

I.T.A. is filed under Section 260»-A of t.h¢ I11t:o:’m(:g
Tax Act, 1961 against the order dt. 27/ if
by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Parlajifigizch in
ITA. No.276/PANJ/2002. ~

This ITA coming on for
this day, Gopala Gowda, J, pa_s*.se:d’t.IA1(=:-fol1owf13:)g:V’£- ” ‘
The questions already
answered against the 2006 and
connected cases of: .? Following
the same, was Vanswering the
questions A
sal-

Iudqe )

Sd/~
Tudge