The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs General Investment & Commercial … on 8 March, 2010

WW-m war -mmmwm-m-mm-mumm.-mwwwjMg"-'mm-m=mmm'nm =s-~a-mm mwm m'-mm-KNm;mam- ¥'1'!E§'rl*i '€;§IJURT 0?" !€.AKWMi"ARfl; MEG?!" 603.5%? 9% mmmmm mm-wa;m*

H? TEE Eflfi Cflifi'? GFKAWATMQ 32' BANGMQRE

mrm imsnm swims: car Mam:-z, 203.9 %   

PRESE}*¥T

'rm Hozmm amwsncs K,IJ,MA§IJa}I§}§.Ti_fi'V"":   é %  

ma Homm 1sms...3Us'rm B.v.1§Aéa» 1:} 

 

1.

2..

— f
Attgavaraf – V 0 ‘

V’ for L{.’v’.S&hac:i’3a1a, fidvj

‘§’§5§ ER filfi Litflfi’ fi 2535 Qf LT’, act,

‘ U .; arixirg am 6%’ mdm éamé; i3,i§..2®§ m

%’%”r

ETA 153.99?! bang; 2032, far that ammammt year 199??-
Q8, prayirg that this Horfbie Court: may In pimsad 13¢;

i. Farmulate flrze sumtaz1&s.I quwticng csf ~

tkmréun,

Alinw the appeal and set ar_d7ér” ” ”
Imme Tax Appeal _!-I§2.9’9’f{ V’

13.1 1.2305 and mxfiimn A;;§pVenats
Csmmrkaiszmw ézfder ‘giaasedfby the
asst, Gamma, éf Mazfim,
in am inmm of

‘mm fig! siscm. was day,
Mangumatg ‘.1; tiger.-gxgeeixsgg

iakm szfip far tmmzg’ , am

— stxhmithfik that: 11%

in this agsrpmi 1% watered by thfi

jwm%%* Court in rm Rmmgzsm cm rm

5′,.,__, .EfI¢¢345!V逧3; aam gm Femm me? betwaen ms

%:;g%.m mam vs; ammmwzmzm C5? Emma

” § whmnn ma qumm gr iaw gs amwema

~ ‘4 in favmzx aftiw mwma mfi

wwmma W?” seammmmmma muwm emmmm mflxmmimmm mawm mmwwfi mfia” imwmmimgmlmm §'”a£w:m mwmma waw éxmmammamwwa mawss'”a mwwame mm mmmw-mmuwve mnwm wwmau

.2 Tim aasasmw.