IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ITA.No. 1169 of 2009()
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. M/S.C P LONAPPAN & SONS,
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.P.K.R.MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM
Dated :13/08/2009
O R D E R
C .N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &
C. K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ.
--------------------------------------------
I.T.A. No.1169 OF 2009
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 13th day of August, 2009
JUDGMENT
Ramachandran Nair,J.
The question raised is about the assessee’s entitlement towards
deduction of Rs. 17-odd lakhs paid to employees under Voluntary
Retirement Scheme. Even though senior standing counsel appearing
for the revenue submitted that the assessee has closed the business and
therefore deduction by way of terminal benefits to the employees is not
allowable deduction, we notice from the Tribunal’s order that the
purpose of payment was to release some of the employees from service
for reorienting the business to suit the changed economic scenario. It is
clear from the Tribunal’s finding that the business is continuing after
restructure. So much so we find that the Tribunal rightly allowed the
appeal. This appeal is consequently dismissed. However, if facts
assumed by the Tribunal based on which decision is rendered are
incorrect, it is for the department to verify whether the assessee has
2
closed business in that year and if required to move the Tribunal for
rectification of the orders.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR)
Judge.
(C. K. ABDUL REHIM)
Judge.
kk
3