The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S. Maheshwari Cotton Seeds on 10 March, 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUET BENCI-LAT
DHARWAD. 7 

DATED TI-IIS THE 10m DAY 01? MARCH 20;~0--l' " 
?RESENT TTTVA l
TI-IE I-ION'BLE MR.JUSTI(§filll1§.:K.?ATI1,;"  
AND _  1 A. ll

THE I--ION'BLE MR. JUSTICEB. .L?.o'w15A

Income Tax /-'gp_Qeal   201(l)H° 

Between:

1. The Cornrnis:j--:vio'ne:f--of   TV  
Feroz Khirnj.ilf)ha;fC.ornnaercjai C-o:mple;sc",'"
Opp. Civi1=i'Ho$"pita"1','~Dbr§"A'mbed:l:ai'-_Road,
Belgau__rnV--59Q '03}; 3  " ~ 

2. The Income Ta§A,--«V.._'l'V 
Ward--l',«Go_kak..  

 ~   0.  -- Appellants

(By Sri M.V. Sheshachaia, AdVocate~absent)

  f-,2. N K   , A ..... .. H

I\/lfsl I1f§a'ir15*$l'm:fa1";i'Cotton Seeds,
Oil I"ndu'et'rie's;"--A_PMC.--"Road, Gokak.
W    ~ Respondent

Thlls..irl1c.orne tax appeal is filed 121/ S 260--A of the Income Tax

 "  1961, 'against the order passed in MA. No. 13/ PNJ/2009

 da»1ie»d 07.08.2009 85 I.T.A. No. 187/PNJ/2007 dated 05.09.2008 on

, ._  t'helfi1e*of.Athe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji Bench, Panaji,
V"  _C1'is'rnilssing the appeal filed by Revenue and etc.

é/A/~



This appeal coming on for hearing on interlocutory
application this day, N.K.Patil J., delivered the following:

JUDGMENT

In the instant case, neither the appellants

for the appellants is present. We are constraine_d~’to ..

counsel is not present nor the partyighas..appieared’*-loeforiethis

Court. However in the interest of theappellants, we’o1jde_red i;”10l’.iC’e”‘ ,

earlier. But the counsel for the appeilhantsphas it for granted
and not made any alternative.arrangernent be present before the
Court when the case is posted,:’ jvare constrained to

dismiss the instant’iap’pea]_ on account ofthe_,non–representation by

the appellapntsiiipersionally’and”‘throiigh’ithe counsel. Accordingly,
the appeal .diisrnisseidi.i’or noin=–:plrosecution.

       SM
hL_u       goose

353$':
f:§§GE