The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs O C Radhakrishnan on 5 August, 2009

3*’ ‘MXJRIIVI MI’! ‘\I””W\UW.5°Wl#”‘\I\fi”‘9

BETWEEIN :

|F”‘H\.3W’* k..*s..M…H$_.| ‘\Ji” WHWIVMHMRM f”‘l¥\.’3’¥’? EKIUNQ \.J|”‘ IX!-\l’U\N’-‘H:Hl\i-3 l””HK3’i”‘F LUUKI LII” KRKNAIMRA HID” LkJUW€% LN” E’i.¢{¥€!WsMiTé?-3H’%.M W””fi§E…:4’5″”¢ KKJUV

.1.

m rune: mm? orumwam arr numm
DATED THIS THE 5* DAY OF AUGUST 2009 % %
rm mrmmxmmsnm xm. u

rmnorm

C.R.

Ward–15.(2}._ %
cxsuimm.

1 ….a.ppemm.

‘ Swlmahala, Sta1% Counsel far the

sr1;a.c..Raammaxmm,
” £19,112, 455 Crm, Windnmn,
” * .P &T Celony, Hcrwvlz,
Banasawadj Past,
Bfilore-560 O43. …Rasp¢::rx3.e:1t.

T1319 Income Tax Appeal is mad under 260-1′; 0!’ LT.
Act 1%}. atrium out ef the erdezr dated G7-09-2007′
passed in I.’I’.A.!i’a.4-79/ B83} 2130′? for the Asaeaament