The Commissioner Of Income Tax vs The New India Assurance Co Ltd on 22 October, 2008

_ ANQ:  V

 THE,HE11é I¥~;iDIA" z1ssuRAHDIs COMPANY LIMITED
1 _D;r:>.,ND.V1 4TH 'I=I,c>D_P

"  'I«..'?'.AC'f,"_« 1951, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 11.10.2005 AND
PCDRRIGENDDM DATED 20.11.2905 PASSED IN ITA ¥~£0.1533/BANG/2005

_ "F€)R;THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2001-2002, PRAYING TD FORMULATE THE

*  -SU_BSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF mw STATED THEREIN AND TO ALLOW
= ~ THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED 31' THE INcDME~TAx
"  ., {APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN ITA No.1533/BANG/zoos, DATED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED TI-Izs THE 22"" DAY OF OCTOBER 2oogV'H.._ '=._k
PRESENT _ f  I
THE I--IDr~I'BI_e iV!R.JUS'IICE K.SREEl3HAR;[f{A£)_A1:VV: "
AND        
THE I-«ID~'sI.E MRJUSTICE C;=3.K:£ib§ARAS¥VAM¥'If-,___'Q, T

INCOME TAX APPEAL. 1110.319' DI-* 2eD3A_»A   

Bfimfifim

1 THE COMMISSIONER QHNCOME , 
CRBUILDING  -   ;  1-
QUEENS ROAD ..  ~
BANGALORE  

2 THE INCOME 'I'AP:,._o,I_=I==I.;, ADVOCATE)

U!§JI'P(.BUZ£._f3--ING  
3C~ROA{3 v  
BANGALC)RE_--§ 51591092 ...RESPONDENT

(By “sgI:. M v JAVALI, ADVOCATE)

V * *»THI$”‘INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF

11.13.2606 AND CORRIGENDUM DATED 20.11.2006 AND CONFIRM THE

‘a.

_,
AX

2

ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER, CONHRMING TME

PASSED BY THE xwcome TAX omega (ms), WARD 16(3), ..amAi«?,f

K. SREEDHAR RAD, 3., DEUVERED THE FOLLOWING_:- ~ .- __ »

Sri.M.V.JavaIi takes notice for tI’ié:._rv4’e’sponr!e’é:’sut’..v’:’_ ”

I.A.2/2008 is atlowed. The desgyoor 2é3%o%déys§vosn%fit:ng%

the Appeal is condoned.

The substantial que5tion_ A§fjrv’;”j1::t§V1¢v_i’s’-Qoigapeal
is no more res-inteovra…a__riii..iifhlogsoroo decided in
favour of the revenuo In and other batch
of cases. In terms of in the said

case, this Appeai i.s.{oisposed _
Iudge

Sd/-

Judge