IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
Dated this the 4"' day of August, was
Before
ma' HOMBLE MR 11131102 HULUVAIH G '
aw Pumas' ' 296.25 / b' V'
B" ! , 2 } -T '
The.-Cresent School
ByitsSacretary--MohmsmadTanwem " ' }Peti1ioner
(By SriKNSubha Ready, A F' H H
And:
;
2 Hm' t<ii*of%Pvbl1v
' V. 3 Digfiist, Kola:
V
562 105, Kola: U
' " L (By 5 GA)
" Writ Petition is filed nude: Att.Z26/227 of me Constitution
qnashuumxmecissuedhyfltcdfl' rcsponden1,c1c.
Thhwz-'itPfion wmhgmfmfhafiagflfisdagflwcammak
.*me following: MA.
ORDER
Pemmer” has sought for tswmcc’ ofwrit a” mum: H V %
education in English’ medium’ for mm’ ‘ __
language policy ofihe sme as
Kamada or mam Engage so tie — ‘j ‘ ofindia and
comm-y to Article 3o(:i–)_of desire that the
as a madim: of
msauct1on’ ‘ in binding an the paiume:
man” also the __ to
accond panmss1on’ ‘ :9 mm mm in mm
for t ct’ pfnzlay achoois wifi Eajglfl mecfalm of
taking mm afihe Fuli Bench mam ofmb coast. 11:: Fun
%mt!1eorx|e1’%l’ byfic
JP}-r’
ommnence prknary schools by seekim 4
fhat there is finalisation oflanglage policy by
of gmu Beach dated 2.7.2<m. It is for the pcfifiancr and
V to mi: for mmmcmm: ofprimry schoois mam
English medium only from the next acadmic my i.e. from
Gowmment dated 29.4.1994 to me efiect that up $3 the
me'mstimnm' 3shaIl1mpart' . educam' oalyhxamadamedmm'
Bcihatasitmay,itis£hecaseofti1e «fiat;
Benchdecisaon' andasamaiterofnght,' iheyvéae 9:"
It is the submission that it is for the
petitioner to approach flfl their application
has becn remained/r;je¢:g;<§?"on fine gamma] y. 1%, a 's
It is_§iI;!' file ' .9 to ootmden" the xppik firm' of
in accordance with law. This court, in a batch
In M View of the mam, patitimu is «mace
(.}o\u%lryfifiagfi*esh I-Iawcver,
to take: an decision to accord approval to u
. l. E r as r of . .
In View of the Full so issued by me Gcswrmnam petiflona £9 hacby quashed Peiitian is ._ =