The Deputy Chief Engineer vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 4 March, 2010

1 MFA 2711/2009
IN THE men comm' OF KA.Ri'\iA'I'AKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS ON THE 04'"! DAY OF MARCH 20 
BEFORE in 
THEE HONBLE'. MR. JUSTICE ARAvINo.Is.nl_fIyI.eiI'<ll..:::  C V
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPE3A1;;.'l\lO:.:fl2I'?Aji gooal _ 
BETWEEN C C

The Deputy Chief Engineer
(Construction), V  
South Western Railway. '
No.18, Millers Road. ._ .
Contonment.   _  '  '    
Bangalore 560 04.8.,'   ;..1APPELLANT/ S
[By Smt. KS.  /'s.fl?Y31yamitra Advocates)
AND  ....    1' 4' V" ' Z

1. Thelidanid p.c£1o1isILIofi"ofIIceI- -
And Assistant.' Co.i13ml*S_Sio.n'eI',
Chickafn_aga_Vlur' ._ ' C'

  H. B. Dayan.anda Basavaraj.
    ..... 
v_S/o.'S&ri, Basappa,
 'I:'.irenIaga1ur;,
'«.C'CliiekaIriagal:ir Taiuk 8: District.  RESPONDENT/S

=l=*=3'-*7?

 filed u/S 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act

:1 '.i''~.against thejudgment and award dated: l.5.04.2008 passed in LAC
 ' N'c.1/2Q06 on the fiie of the Civil Judge (SrIDn.), Chiekmagaiur,
" sallowing the reference petition for enhanced compensation.

This MFA coining on for Orders this day, the Court

C' " . :cleliveI"ed the following:



2 MFA 271}./2009
JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant has filed Memo-..seeking

for return of t.he appeal papers to enable her

before the District Court. Chickniagaliix’. since”‘t’h§’..y£ilV1.1atio:1 or

the present; appeal is less than Rs. ioilpakh-sh? it

2. Memo is accepted appellant to
withdraw the appeal. In, jfiew pot’ Vi..the”‘1\/_I’e111oA”{‘i’}cd~’l’or seeking
permission to withdraw having been
accepted by this for refund of
the Court ‘beep-;’p.aid.”oavthelappeal memorandum.

3. ddii*ec.’ted’to”revtu1*n the appeal papers to
the leai’nee1′.rcounVselVVlVto’:_i;e,n’ahle».:then1 to fiie the same before the

jurisdictional C’ourt..fIfheA’=Cot;irt fee paid on this appeal is also

‘(3rd_ei*ed!t*o 1″e_t”unded:* ———- ~ ”

sd/~
EEEDGE