High Court Karnataka High Court

The Deputy Chief Engineer … vs The Land Acquisition Officer & on 5 March, 2010

Karnataka High Court
The Deputy Chief Engineer … vs The Land Acquisition Officer & on 5 March, 2010
Author: Aravind Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAIKA, BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE: Sm mv or MARCH 2010". 

BEFORE

THE) HON'8LEZ MR. JUSTICE ARAv1NI3«r-irulimgréij   

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL  fie? £009   T

BETWEEN:

The Deputy Chief Engineer
(C0r1struei'i0n}, V   
South Western Rai1way,=._  _ 
No.18, Millers Road. A A
Contonment,   .   _   A "
Bangalore --        APPELLANT
(By Smt,.K.S§. A_siu_s"L1y.:r1, foli";M'{S=Nyayamit.ra
    "  

AND:
1.

‘1’ he Land A’eqvuiVsii:i0r1. C)§ficer
_ An,..ri;{Ass%st,ani. ‘C.Qrnmf.ssi0ner.
CF1veieka,maga1ur. ” “”” ”

2. A Sri. VChfar1r;2if;.eS~hava.

3/ 0.; ‘ Ma’i;:5’Qr£.;= Garrgan 112:,
Age: M_aj~0_r1j’..– A
Hireméigalyur.

ChEek2;rriag21lL1r TR :3: Dt. RESPONDEZNTS

‘ This MFA filed u/8.5-4(1) of I..anci Acrquisitiorl Act,

Aa.’g:ai*;»r1s3′{, the common judgement and award dated

18.04.2008 passed in LAC No.89/2006 on the file of the
Civil Judge {Sr.Dn.). Chikm21g21l1.1r. allowing
reference petition for enhanced eompensaiion. 7

This Appeal Coming on for Orders tE1is_;’c’i’a1y.’,V’~.t:he;_.

court. delivered the following:

JUDGMEN;1:”«<iA 0

Learned counsel for the alppéllai-ii:A'subrr3.1ts.tliatlapl"

Memo has been filed on silt-ci1.i.r1g.{iiiiereiiticljer
that the Subject matter" Qf less
than Rs. 10 lakhs, the before the
District Court seelfs lsppeal papers

reserving liberty'-4'ieolihhe appeal before the
District She also states that
Court: feevof'-Rs.2V{3;:'§§%}8/'–~.__had been paid in this appeal

and seeks pe"1:missio_I1 'for'refL111d ofthe same.

__fiV\/i«"<FT1<) 'IllS.._…?iCiC€pt€(l sad the appellant is

.0'-perrfii–=£.t;e'd4:t'o;'w:it.l1draw* the appeal. In View of the Memo

fiiedlor se<§%'i~;i11'g'l;)errnission to wiihdraw the appeal and

same: ha.fJi'11.g7 been aeeepteci by ihis Court appellant;

-‘..u

wouid be em:i’i’1ed for 1’cf1md of the C(;}1,1rt fee. which has

been paid on the appeai memorandum.

3. The Regisiry is directed to refund fee ”

and also the appeal papers to endablc-E-~f,I3;ed’sgppéi-Earitw-L1.0:;T.«

file the same before the app1’c-‘gj5ri.a.t<: C0ui"t.V

C21