High Court Karnataka High Court

The Deputy Commissioner vs C Ramaiah Reddy on 12 October, 2009

Karnataka High Court
The Deputy Commissioner vs C Ramaiah Reddy on 12 October, 2009
Author: V.Gopalagowda And B.V.Nagarathna
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 1127'" DAY OF OCTOBER,  . 

PRESENT

THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE_V.,cgQPALA"GciwI5A,'_' ._  

AND A _
THE HONBLE MRS. JU-'STIQE Bh»r.:§1A.GA1=§A-5:;>;1\1A. 

WRIT APPEAL NO.§84 /2Q09(I {LR) .' 

BETWEEN:

I. The Deputy Co mrnissg:1'Aon:éf;'.: _ _  .
Bangalore   .   V   " 
Bangalor__e;'  ' " ' « ~ *   '

2. The Special Cr._)Vr.r11_i1issi@,.._.-2-1*,
(EnfaVrcemer3t)'V office afihe
Deputy Com1i1i.~"{='='~iQiLfir';%'-T.T. " ' '
Baflgaloke.    "
 " ...APPELLANT

 _ [By   

 «  !_   

Sri .C,.__VRame  T Raddy,

 -VS/0. Iafiéchinnappa Raddy,
~ ~ f  ' ~ . __ Aged 53 -years,
_ ' gRésidi;1g at Ramaiah Raddy colony,
 T S€Ci0Z'?C, Basavanagar,
. . A3/farathahaili Post,

  'v.B_Eu'1ga10re--37.

.. .RESPONDENTS

(By Sri: H.C.Shivara.m and Sri. ‘I’.P.Ven}<;anar1da, Adv.
for C / R 1) fiv

/'

THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED {}/S 4
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYENG "T0–DSZDSEVF
ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED
190.1608/2009 DATED 20/02/2009.

This Appeal coming on for]:lprl_V:,lD

Nagarathna J., delivered the following;
JUDGMEflgu
Heard the learned appellants and

the learned oouiaeejl fo1::_th;e -:f*es'po'rltient..V.fl

2. Thisl’oap;5f:ea1 3};fl11¢’c1.l’,j¢haj1éf:g:ng that portion of the
order ofzthe’«leVa1’ned:jstng€lejtidge granting interest at 6%

p.a. vsnth effeCt_:Vfr0n1 tl’1eT.d:ate of receipt of Rs.1.90 Crore

‘fromletlie-.”res’pondent’in respect of an amount paid in an

Bangalore South Taluk

“‘a11;o.tion conducted by the appellant on

V –.’}j: a notification dated 12.41.2007, the

“–‘3-Ti,*’V’f.__appellant… proposed to auction certain lands in and

including land

DVDHT-me–asuring 15 guntas in Sy.No.24 of Kenchenahalli

“Village, Kengeri Hoblifiangalore South Taluk. The land

3;.

IN THE

the case, we find it is just and proper and that no

contrary View can be taken. Hence, this Writ

dismissed being devoid of merit.

S=6=