.r.;>
EN THE HIGH coum OF KARNATAKA AT sAN<;§Ai;G1§_E.j ,
DATED THIS THE 4th DAY 01:' JUNE 26:69' :1 "
PRESENT;
THE HON'BLE MR. RB. mNAKAi?.A1S%;
A:%:_;;j- % _ _
THE HC}N'BLE s}gBEi;§H:j5
wmr A§::{é:;A3, 1$*f3i;;é£)eg
BETWEEN; - . "
1 THE GO.i}i«M}:$5§SIQ--¥3E.i§ V'
I,iAéSA:€f'D1si?4R'iCf:'¢»ff'
rifissnw '
2 THE'-QEWTY §:{)r~:éE£éirAToR OF FOREST
VHASSAVN ms'§#RICI'*"
F, §-«1AssAN'* ..
' THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
R"EP+BY.I'PS SECRETARY
. EPA._R'I'.Lfv'£ENT 01:' REVENUE
. M.S.'Bi}ILDING
v,1,m§A2~iA VEEDHK
BMEGALORE. .APPELLAN'I'S
VA ~ (By~sn2"BAsAvARAJ KARED§Y, GOVT'. ADVOCATE. 3
- AND :
1 KEERTHY
szo KALINGAPPA
R/O MANOORU VELLMEE,
YASALUR HOBLI,
SAKALESHPUR TQ
HASSAN DIS'I'RiC'i'.
REP BY GPA HOLDER
J.V.SUBRAYA
sm .1 B VASANTBEGOWDA
AGES 48 YRS,
R/O JAFAVATHE ESTATE
MUDIGERE, -- "
CHiKMAGALUR TALUK
KALINGAPPA _ ._ _
S/0 PARAMESH(}()WDAa_ L
R/0 MANOORU wLLAQE;'_' j
YASALUR H{}_BI..I,;' * -- .;
SAKALESi~l'BL}R TQ 1 "
HASSAN'--..DI:E{l_'RiC{; _
1:é1§15 BY5r:;PA 'E§4bLijEiR
J..v.su3RA'?v';z_ * 'A
3/0 .1 B vASA.:§?fH§é3<§*NDA
AGEfl_43vYRS, ; "
V R70 J,%%;PAVA1'Hi"vES';*ATE
F, M'U.3IGER-E1,' V
'CIfiIKMAGALO':'€E TALUK
* K' SHA,NI{AREGOWDA
.S]v£5"!?U'?§'I33GOWDA
A A R/oMg\;§ooRu VILLAGE,
YAS5-HER I-IOBLI,
SAKALESHPUR TQ
HASSAN DISTRICI'.
~ 'T ~..REP BY GPA HOLBER
'- ..=..I.v.sUBRAYA
S] O J B VASANTHEGOWDA
AGES) 48 YRS,
R] O JAPAVATHI ESTATE
MUII)iGERE,CHIKMA,GALORE TALUK
C E PRASANNA
3/ 0 EERAPPA
R/O MANOORU VKLLAGE,
YASALUR HOBLI,
SAKALESHPUR TQ
HASSAN DISTRICT.
REP BY GPA HOLBER
VJ.V.SUBRAYA
5/0 .1 B VASANTHEGOWQA
AGE!) 48 YRS,
R/O JAPAVATHI §:s'rAT1;:_._. f.__
MUDIGERE,
CHIKMAGALORE *1'--.§LIJ1%; ; u
(3 N JAYAP_m_ '
S/O I:%AN:-.j}A~l5§A' »
R,I.GT.MAN0t:~agU '~.§L1._{AG;§,--,.._VVV_
YASALUR .§'IO'E3L},4 .
sAKALEsH?uAR%*:fQ%»_TVT .. ' -
HASSAN D1ST1€!_(3'F,_
REP'BY'" GPA HVOLDER
V .J.V.SU=3R AYA- _
" S/9 J B VASANTHEGOWDA
. .... ..'
R] 9 JAPAVATHI ESTATE
' _M1H3£G§E',f€E,
%. c:HI':;1%¢1Ag2=ALORE TALUK
APPASWAMY
S] SUBBEGOWDA
Rfi} MANOORU WLLAGE,
~ "--.,YASALUR 13053,
= SAKALESI~E1?'UI?'i'Q
rmssan msrmcr.
REP BY GPA HOLSER
J.V.SUBRAYA
S10 3 B VASANTHEGOWDA
AGED 48 'ms,
10
21 , é V
- "W./O MANJEGGWDA
5
REP BY GPA HOLDER
.}.V.SUBRAYA
S] O J B VASANTHEGOWDA
AGED 48 YRS,
R] O JAPAVATPII ESTATE
MUDIGERE,
CHIKMAGALORE TALUK
E A YELLEGOWDA
S/O ANNEGOWDA
R/0 MANOORU VILLA(}E,'_
YASALUR 11031.1, "~
SAKALESHPUR TQ
HASSAN DESTRICT.
REP BY GPA HOL-{ERR
J.V.SUBRAYA ~
31.1.0-V-J, B~-VAS;%NT'HEGGWBA..
AGED T43jYRs:i,' _ .
R10'-JAPAv.é;TH%I.TEs?rA,3"L1%;sA1<ALEsHPUR TQ
- ,H'AS;s:.AN.,;B':s'rRICr.
' REP BY GPA HOLDER
J.f_v.'s1;BRAYA
E3/Q J B VASANTHEGOWDA
AER.. -- '
.1;'v.$IJB':2AYA'-«. 1, "
3/ 0.3 B VASAN'FHE--GOWDA
AGED'--«{48'vYR:3, ' ~'
; 'mo JA1~*-.wA'mi ES§'A'i'E.
" '~'e.m_J13:GERE;,« ..... 14 «
' cH:iK;&mGAL0RE TALUK
V 's:ws.;é;I~z.g;;éi~gi2s.§lA
W'W/'{)I'1?'E:'5RABADRAPPA
R/G MANOORU VILLAGE,
YASALUR Homi,
SA§%;ALESHPUR TQ
" HASSAN I:21sTR£c'r.
REP BY GPA HOLDER
V' " J.V.SUBRAYA
S] O J B VASANTHEGOWEA
AGED 48 YRS,
R] O JAPAVATHI ESTATE
MUDEGERE,
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by §});_c».A»VS_tatefi-ré:Sf’2a§tJgd€i::..tf3 _ ” ~ ‘V
W.P.No.4808/2008 being agggievéa by ..:thé.. ox’~§Ie£”
26.3.2008 wherein the lea.r1:te=’ri_ ‘Sj12g1<§'»Jiidge
the writ petition and remitted me' "11_,1ba1'€tcr mag: fésp£]and€nis~
appellants hercin for filfi:-;'»1_iV:"';3('}}C1'.'m'§i.(1§;f.§'.'Ac!.1t'L'£:T;$_i},'£§f,flC16 applicatien of
the pefitionexs inAacco1danC ¢ Q .
2. The” ;’heVrein:1 _Hfi1¢23 w.p. M14808] 2003
being 1.;_;m,_ éndorszément issued by the
mayofificnis ‘§vhe1’ei3n the application filed
fer pezmiésséonvv _ ° as sought for by the writ
_ p{§tif,i%§IiCIS waér by the impugn-sci order dated
cncicrsement dated 21.9.2907. it is
petition that petitioners am cnfitled to
cut”‘i3.1c 3fI.’h6S;i;h}? seeking permission from the respondents in
:_.”f.31€j.vrit’p.éi:ition and permission ought to have been granteci
fihc appiication for permission to fell the trees has been
rejected by holding that no permission can be
\}
gxantcci to fell the trees situate in _t1:;cp_p1’iv;1’ée’ _th<=:fi " "
trees were not leased in favour of peiifiéfinfiifs'.
3. The learned sing1e”;._.:m§ge ‘hast: a11<5i¥§%§§§i:._:'t21¢? 'amt
petition following the decisiQH1f:LV':A' WP.
No.3932/ 2007 oAn'&–.15?.§.2J.2u0f§v8':(i'»i.Rfiuttcgowda 66
others vs. The Deputy and remitted
the matter f§j:$*Q*::«L f'I"c':5V.-;~".uh "'<;*%)11:%*.ic1.<3rat:ioI1 of the
application ic;-.fV With 3aW« B31113
aégdevfid thtéigtvaxncd Single Judge dated
26.3.20€}8,,V_resp<m§ieu:T1:§% writ petition have preferred
this of 310 tiays in filing the appeal
.. «. _9;3dyv}«–éE3pficafiQn filed for concioning the said delay
:W&' havc heard tht: learned Gavcmment Advocate
. _. H ., ' —- _ :a;9p¢'ari.fi;"g.. fur the appellants.
HA5. Learned Government Advocate appearing for the
T '"Ta"g§pe}.1ants submitted that the delay has been satisfiactorily
expiained and the leamed Single 'Ludge was not justificd in
K?'