The Deputy Director K G I D vs Smt Hemalatha on 30 March, 2009

mi

'   s/ca Late Ramesh,
_  A,g(i:':"-4 years,

* w[ : .4(R€:§§oondents 2 and 3 being minors rep. by their
   giatural guardian ---- 1" respondent)

IN THE HIGH comm' OF KARNATAKA, BAb;GAJ§Q:;l;Ef 
DATED THIS THE 30TH DAYQF MAR--£7'.Ej { J
BEF0RE_ * u T V'  

THE HUMBLE MR;4IU$TI(§E._I§.BILL?s3??Ai  %

 

MFA%,Na,3159'g' L

BETWEEN:      A

The Deputy Di;r¢:e":tgr;1fV___-.'. 'V    
K.G.I.D.,    
Mandya      

Mandya.  *  .4  _  .. APPELLANT

(By Sri for Appellant)

   W] 0 Late Ramesh,
Ag0=_ 23%y€a:'3;T' 

.  sit/ofgéite Ramesh,
x__Agc: 3~.ye:ars,

£/



4. Smt. Puttathayamma W1 0 Moondegowda. 

Age: 55 years, 

All are r/0 Chinnadoddi Vilkzge,   _ @ <  

Matidur Taluk, Mandya Dist:rict. 

5. Sri Shivananda s/0 Basappa,     AA
6"-h cross, Sri M.V.Nagara__M.addur '1'0wI'x',,_  
Pmp. M/s Megha   

6. The Executive f3nsg;i1'3r-;cr,_«'A _ A  .4 V 
Central Street Divisiun, r %  ' ; j   
KPTCL (KEB), Bangalor¢-   " 
Owner ofLC{t'ry V '* 

No.KA    ~ v..-..ERESPONDEN'FS

[Sri S.Mai1¢sfij;K;T';'Ns;§é:_1?irfijI-{}R;'Sat11ish,Advs. for
R1 (R2 &  aifirzipresented by R1)]
(Ra?   it4§ m:::"i1;{;1x'epresented}

 'v'E':1is'4'IvI§'_A"is tixeci 1}./S.30(1} ef we Act against
 E judvmeriig... .... dated 29~4-2006 passed in

 % ss;o.xvc,5,!1:1<_',/25/2003 on the file of the Labour Ofiicer
 .a:1d_ 'Cpmngissioncr for Workmen's Compensation,
 .S1'1b.--33ii?isicr1--»»§Z, Mandya, awarding a compensation of

1?$;i2,4~§,3255/~ with interest at 12% RA.

~~  MFA coming for hearing this day, the Court

   ark;-;*1.ivcitd the fo110w'ing:~

J U D G M E N T

The Immed counsel for the

respondents/claimants has flied £1 memo stating that

V.

appeal filed by the claimants, seeking _
in MFA No.55?()/0?, has been ajglgwed u
the appeal has become infmctitgous

may be dismissed.

2 Aamnmm¢g,am;§gg@fifim d§mfi§§¢ as

having become ‘ ‘

3. Ifiiémg ‘

‘shall be transmitted to
the ” « ~*Wor]mcn’s Compensation,

Mandya,
” _____ «
Judge