The Devarajanagara Primary … vs State Of Karnataka By Its … on 20 March, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT or K_A_R_-____.A A- 

DATED THI$ TEE 2o"'na3 or fihE£fi,f2ofi3-

THE HON'BJ'..E MR.JusT.:g:cE  
WRIT PETITION No.29§'2.'%oT 2o'o'e(:t3fi-PEas)
BETWEEN ; A. 3 % A'

1 THE DEVARAJAJJAQAEA 'm;1;M.3121r "=.;_.-1és.I.r~».r.II':.-1:1

co-opERATz.vE §_SOCEITI 'LTx:_> . ', 

E31-.'E21*ICE.'*{ I1,"  
 rx=mV1$Ni>4GE12E BY ITS
TRESTEENTV, sR1.'A;M.1R"'Jm§ szua,

.=.:/To .:L_ATE 

MED' A39uT"462«.,%mAns; . . . PETITIONER

(By E113  :"§fi.~.,..#'~'  CIVIL SL-'PPLI s BEFAR"1'h'EI~'e'T ,

h "  M.S ;"3U'1'LDI1<rc-.1 BANGALORE.

2" THE VDEPUTY comxssxounn
n T DAVAIGAGERE DISTRICT,
 DAVANAILIEIQE; .. RESPOPFJEEPEE

'E.I-- Ir -I-1-I-an

 §(::n_y SE1: B.  "E", aL:A""' )

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 S:
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, EBAXLEQ 1'9
QUASI-I THE NOTIFICATION D'I'.24.1.2OD8 VIDE ANN-
1:



-rams mu-r PETITION cmnla VA

i'RT.LilEiiiii7f '?iIii\fiii~it'i -riiis   @3335!" ' _

 

authorisation to mm   stat
Dawangere. The    is
challenging Anmxunéy-3%' $4  passed by
tho.-Qt Deputy  imru-.1ng
    authorisatt-an for t

"""*-;"i"Fx..v iggugm-a».,.a.=.;."'s..u s an *.:b.e gs:-.:-..:.'-..-'.|.

that  'cart --   to the petitioner shop'

wou1.Ad_ 'V  by the respondent and

the the new fair prise dmot.

to the aavaammnt. –Mwoaata,

as control Order 1992, the

E
:2
;

for the benefit of oami ‘lloldoru and

clause 11 the nesponcbnt is also at.

liberty to withdraw the axon” cards in -axons:

of 500 in the city area and assigning such

8′

excess cards to any other shop for the * V.

of the card holders. managing, V AL

the respondents have no
the cards
authorised shop as ” :’ to
him, the pgtigihmr with 553

r_2aI..1.’:l..s; far above the

‘V3, in Vdiurcumatanuea, the writ

1; granting liberty for they

V’ .. “_–_ to approach the Deputy-

ar

Davangere, if the cards assigned

A.–I.–:-. ‘.2 .|..|a…I
um “u.a.|.-.|.s”.’51″‘n”u:’i.’L” an an

number of cards.