The Divisional Controller vs Gm Madhu S/O G Mareppa on 24 April, 2009

ORDER

This writ Petition is by the defendant. Sixit    
plainfifij respondent for injunctirxen;   an x

application for ad-jmmfm itljunetion, Sega

granted by the learned theV

appellate Court. Having Vvto “tee feet. both the
courts below found them ‘:fseie_ case, balance of
convenience respondeng
Dguestion of t_’e¢gj&«v§~,§;file1″‘Veoncu11ent findings
does it is found that he is
in __ reason to interfere with the
concurreiafié’ rejected. The Court is

infozfmeci thzite-511 the esrfier writ petition direction is issued

‘ ,,£Q «the earliest. The learned trial Judge

‘ -..si:r.a3:.V1V Vifiiirection issued.

Sd/-

Fudge

.1″/Y