The Divisional Controller vs Nagappa S/O Fakirappa Jadar on 8 March, 2010

EN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD

DATED THIS THE Tam DAY OE SEPTEMBER, 2009 
BEFORE I T
THE I~1ON'BLE MRJUSTICE AJIT J.GU1\'J'AT. V  %

WRIT PETITION NO.62089/2U59{'KLR--RR/.;SI_}R}._  T"

BETWEEN:

SMT. DONEMMA,

W /O KUMARAPA

D/O IA 

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, _ ._ .

HOUSEWIFE, RESIDENT OE  '

YERANGALIGI VILLAGE, ' _ .

EELLARY TALUK AND DIST'."* «  1 , 
        _ jI=>ETIT10NER

(BY SMT. K. VID_YA,}ADV.. EDR. SRI_K_:RAGHAV]E3NDRA RAO, ADV.)

AND:

I. THE DEPIJTY 
BELLARYDISTRICT,'BELLARY.

2. TI%IEVA'SST. dC)'MMISSIONER,

 "  ._ EELL:ARYvI--SAuE--DIVISIoN, BELLARY.

 ,3: THE "DERI'IT§f TAHASILDAR,

._ "I'A

 = _1§II-FIDU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
 HOUSE WIFE, RESIDENT OF

 YERANGALEGI VILLAGE,
' BELLARY TALUK AND DIST.

V 5. SMT. SANNA HUCHAMMA,



WIFE OF' HATTI DODDABASAPPA
DAUGHTER OF LATE K. DODDABASAPPA
HINDU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
HOUSEWIFE, RESIDENT OF YERANGALIGI
VILLAGE, BELLARY TALUK AND DIST.  .  V. ,_ t- .1' , 
. RESrONDE~Nf'TS _, 
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTI(;:I.ES._226-AND-;
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAVING2T0...QUAE3H,_TIAS;SE'D BYR1»IN .A?1§E.AL' _
CASE NO.73/2006-07 DT.11 /6 /r:»7_41AND ETC;  A. ; I

THIS WRIT PETITION COMING _ONV"R-ORIT=REI,IMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT..MADE"THE FOLl.QWING:

R'  «

The petitioner  On the
basis of     executed by her
father  4 and 5 make an
application,'   in the records. The

Deputy  directed that name Of

  1'eS,?;if:4I1€:1:e'1*.t%s «4«a1'1«d....5..3ha11 be entered along with that of

hi7  tile" pet'itiGri'e.r:: ' ~ .

"p.arti't_i.on and separate possession.

2.v"";. It is not disputed that a suit is filed for





3. Having perused the impugned order, 1 am of
the View that the impugned order does not warrant

interference inasmuch as the Deputy Commissionerkhpas

directed that names of the petitioner 

respondents 4 and 5 are to be entered_in~»Th:e:re§:ords:."