High Court Kerala High Court

The Dy. Director vs The Secy. Tdb. on 24 November, 2010

Kerala High Court
The Dy. Director vs The Secy. Tdb. on 24 November, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

DBAR.No. 3 of 2004()



1. THE DY. DIRECTOR, LOCAL FUND AUDIT
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. THE SECY. TDB., TRIVANDRUM
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

                For Respondent  :SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN, SC, TDB

The Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN

 Dated :24/11/2010

 O R D E R

THOTTATHIL.B.RADHAKRISHNAN & P.BHAVADASAN, JJ.

————————————————————————

DBAR No.3 of 2004

————————————————————————

Dated 24th November 2010

Order

Thottathil.B.Radhakrishnan, J.

Read TDB final report No.127/10 of the learned

Ombudsman filed in this case after hearing the necessary

parties.

2. The learned Ombudsman concluded that an

amount of Rs.1,24,700/- will be the liability of Sri.Sureshkumar

since no proper vouchers or receipts were produced for

advancing such amounts to the Thanthri and others. However,

the learned Ombudsman states that in fact, Sri.Sureshkumar

had spent Rs.2 lakhs from his pocket for the expenses noted in

the accounts book and he is entitled to get credit of the said

amount. This view is taken because such expenses are

necessary expenses and other sources of income are not

pointed out for incurring such expense.

3. We are of the view that an amount of Rs.2 lakhs

could be given credit to as having spent by Sri.Sureshkumar,

on reconciliation, in the absence of specific vouchers being

DBAR 3/04 2

maintained. We direct that Sri.Sureshkumar will be treated as

not liable for the amount due to the Board, however, that no

amount need be released to him towards any expenditure in

that regard. Following this order, any proceedings against

Sri.Sureshkumar will stand dropped. Pursuant to this, the Board

will take immediate action for quantification of the retiral

benefits due to him subject, of course to other sustainable

liabilities, if any. Let this be done on a time bound manner and

arrears released to him within a period of four months from now

without fail.

The DBAR is ordered accordingly.





                                 THOTTATHIL.B.RADHAKRISHNAN,
                                 JUDGE




                                 P.BHAVADASAN, JUDGE



sta

DBAR 3/04    3

DBAR 3/04    4