High Court Karnataka High Court

The Farmers Sports And … vs The Government Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011

Karnataka High Court
The Farmers Sports And … vs The Government Of Karnataka on 2 June, 2011
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

amen THIS THE 2"" my OF JUNE, 

BEFORE

THE HQMBLE MRJUSTICE MOH;{\-N"5HAN--f;4f§1}§é£:i}:D§;R  A

WRIT PETITION No.13455/9201';(c;~M~mz;;<:E) 

BETWEEN :

The Farmers Sports and .Re-crs3a'LiAo_:r: Centre '
Palahally  '   
Srirangapatna Taiuk ._  x
Mandya Dist.   '
Rep.by its Secretary '

Hemanth Kunfiar 51*' _ _ .   

Aged 40 ye-:ai's       "?_...,PETITIONER

(By Sri  P'.*s . Diva k"ai"ag':Advs.,)

AND :

1. The ~(3?,<.3ver.Vn:'*:1,Ae'r1'ii" of "Kafnata ka
tiC}:m£3.LVDI-;jpartment... <

 ._Vidhémja _Sa_udha

'  Banga|'or_e~. 

 . 'Rep.'b~;"~«§.t_s SveC'retary

23 Sz.1pe.:j'ihté:hdent of Police
Mandya Dist, Mandya

A  The Deputy Superéntendent sf Pofice

 §r%'rangapatna Tafukf Mandya Dist.



4. The Cirde Inspector of
Poiice, Srirangapatna Taiuk
Mandya Dist.

5! Sub Inspector of Police
Srirangapatna Poiice Station
Srirangapatna Taiuk      'V  
Maridya Dist. V  F<ESPON'DE'i\i,TS   "

(By Smt.M.C.Nagashree, 

This writ petition is filed u:iicier_.Arti'oles 226 and 227 of
the Constitutionef India,i-.pi'aying;to E:liree1t'*tlhe respondents
not to insist ,upoI1-_ the p_eti'tione':*."_to obtain the license to
conduct skilled ofienteel g'::_1Ines4_lsi11ehlrumrny, chess and
carom andf 'other"'-lawfuigactivities._Vunder the Police Act, or
under the p£'QV:iSi;'Q_nS of L1"ce;:;si'n*g and Controlling of Places of
Public: .[mT1ivt1.se'1jr1en:EQrder;---.l97'O'*en(i not to interfere with the
lawfulj activities _of'rthe el.i1b_ to conduct skill games like,
tummy', chess aficl 

 ;:ietitionV.oloming on for preliminary hearing,
this jday the Court made the following:~

ORDER

i_’ee’iir3e’el”l.Government Advocate is directed to

take unlotiee for respondents.

2! The petitioner is an Association registered

” “tinder the Kamateka Societies Registration Act, 1960.

3.

The case of the petitioner-Association

,3

engaged in conducting sport;’s””‘a’nd_”..éothef:’tcuitizraig

activities such as Rummy, Dart €;’3_eirn_e”s, Ci’iF§SS.,.

Biiiiards, etc. and other indvoerygarries’ th.e’V”‘b’e”nefit””

of its members. It is the’V.ic’ase*.o’ft_the’ apet.iti.e}ner that
the respondents are’_the petitioner
shouid obtain_fii__cense””either.’:’vi..tinde:rithe Karnataka
Poiice Act Licensing and

(:’8{r)i5roiIin:g–V.._o.f Amusement Order,

3A.”ldent’i<:ai have been considered by

this;'Co.Lirt.' win"WPi'No..i.18625/2005, disposed of on

27;'ia.2»*f):iO6i'..ohoidin§"'Athat permission under the Police

AQtV'iis…iji:«ot iireoluired to run a Society or a Recreation

Ciitiyyio present nature and the petitioner need not

ebtaiiieny iicense to run the recreation activities for

-4-

the benefit ef its members. Accordingly,

order is made:~

The respondents Shall

petitioner should obtain the’–»._,5etCesS.ary_’ §’EV<:e.h§'ew'?6rs the it

skilled games such a"s~…ifum'tfiy',~:'::hVeis;.s andvV"Ca"rc»m and
other lawful activitieei Stitgl .h¢"v¢ev_e~r, that shall
exclude the C{.l.V34i"{:I:_~il7_.:.['aE'T."l:i\33f. *é{itled"'geh*ie-.a.hd electronic coin

This orcle:":'jl:.Qv4.e'\rei"will not come in the way of

the res;§o*~nVdenVts-__VArhbh.'i~toring the activities of the

* _Apei':l_:t:'i~o »..Asso€ii'avti-en.

it disposed of accordingly.

3&5;

§§§§§