IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF FEBRUA§I§'Y','
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A...'SA,f1 é~Q{P.ANN'Aj'll.._.'
M.F.A.NO. 2_g3__3179[2pc9
BETWEEN: ll 2
The ICICI Lombard Mold': .
Insurance Company Ltcfl'.', "
Bellad Building, " V
2nd Floor, Gokul _Ro__ad,/
' ':1 1: .... ..
(By Sri. S . K. h .
AND:
1. Sm t . llelqlaboowlillw/'o..':B'a'Shasab Lavangi
Age: 23ay'e*a.VrsV;_ '
2. S1fi_§.l4latelsanIi)"S:/v_o.&l:narnsab Lavangi
yfiars' .... ..
W/ollatelsab Lavangi
" .Ag.¢%: 5'2"_y.(__~:9 ays,
All""--areV:l?';"E).Garag, Dist: Dharwad.
Sri, R.'"Somanath S/o.RamasWami.
Age"f"«l\/lajor,
'R/'of "Mata Pita",
Siharada Galli, Yallapur,
-'-Tq: Yallapur, Dist: Karwar.
Appellant.
Respondents.
“>.(_S”r:1t. Shaila Bellikatti, Advocate, for R.1 to 3.)
J;
fl
K)
This MFA is filed U/S. 30(1) of WC Act, against
the Judgment and Order dated 31/10/200$…p’as~sed
in WCA/F-152/200′? on the file of the Labo.1,_1_r.O’ffieVer
and Commissioner for Workmen Com:pensa*t«i.dr-2.,
Hubli, awarding compensation of Rs;4V,l5*,~O’93/”~._V
along with interest of 12% 13.51.
This appeal coming on for
the Court delivered. the followingfl
JUDGM1§m:
The appellalritg”ilr;.sidran’cvev”‘»._company has
called in quest_i0r_1_ thew”aizvajr’d’f:,dated’V 31/10/2008
passed in wee/1£62152,zj;2rgQe7 ‘—“bj;%_’ the Labour Officer
and Com_n1gis’swiVoii:e:r__,_ i’orV.._’Wor.k.r1ien Compensation,
Hubli.
2) ‘f’he””-n_t;ia.nt–un’: of compensation as awarded
.b”‘~the..”Ciom1*ni..ssione’r””i’s called in uestion mainl on
3 A A. (1 Y
the wages as reckoned by the
C”»__V,Comrnislsione’r;'[for compensation is on the higher
‘f»,.,,5.itlwe_g. Duri~nlg’;. the pendency of this appeal the parties
rifhave centered into a compromise whereunder the
A”lV_’j~re’s;.pon:cdent .,..c1aimants have agreed that the
it'”~.cno’rnpensaI:.ion payable by reckoning the monthly
Eéxage at Rs.3.000/~ would be the just compensation
t
7f
a clm.i’s sio n th is
payable to the claimants. Since the said compromise
entered into is riot contrary to law, the te1fm.s’««.la~rVe
accepted and as per the compromise the-‘:..awlar:d—-r *
Commissioner which is questioned in it
modified holding that the claimant;Woiuild._lb~e::l’erit:it—l.e’d«:t
to the total ctompensatic-ii’-.._pof lRsl.3.,5’i7.:,lCl*Q’0v/.:as “it
against the sum awarded by CpomII.ii”SS.ei0rA1_er. The
appeal is accordingly disi};os’ed {of onifspiilcgh terms.
3) Since” is deposited
before this amount shall be
disbursedgtoavthe.e1la§i;maript’–.hy ‘registry after proper
identificat7i,or’i.l
4) __in disposal of the appeai,
:li$)i’isc.’c’=ix}§1as-viNai,1oo7’2’4’/2009 does not arise for
coriisi’ldAerlat_i’o.ri”zirid_}~the same is also disposed of.
Sdffi
E1553